Abstract:According to the statistics of 160 typical fire and explosion accidents in oil storage areas at home and abroad nearly 50 years, 122 of them occurred the secondary accidents in the emergency responses. Based on 122 accident cases, 21 causal factors leading to secondary accidents are summarized. In order to quantify the influencing degree of these causal factors on the accident consequences, a multiple linear regression model was established between them. In the modeling process, these factors are decomposed into the criterion layer, variable layer, and bottom layer. The improved analytic hierarchy process (IAHP) was used to establish the relationship between the bottom factors and variable factors, and the regression analysis method was used to establish the relational model between variable layer and criterion layer. For 122 cases of the secondary accidents, this study took the year as a statistical dimension, and obtained 40 groups of sample data. The first 34 groups of sample data were used to build the causal factors model, and the last 6 groups of sample data were tested the generalization ability of the model by using the established regression model combined with grey prediction model. The results show that the prediction ability of the established model was better than that of the grey prediction model alone. Moreover, the relative contribution and change trend of the causal factors were evaluated using the mutation progression method, and corresponding preventive countermeasures were proposed. It was found that human professional skills, knowledge and literacy, environmental issues, and firefighting facilities are the main influencing factors that lead to the secondary accidents. These three kinds of factors show a gradual improvement trend, and the existing prevention measures should be maintained and further improved. The problem of inherent objects or equipment factors has not been effectively improved and has a worsening trend, which is the focus of prevention in the future, and the prevention and control efforts need to be moderately increased. The research results have important guiding significance for understanding the quantitative influences of causal factors on the accident consequences, improving emergency response capabilities, reducing accident losses, and avoiding secondary accidents.

Review on Accident Investigation and Analysis Methods

Review on Pile Quality Accident

Applicability of accident analysis methods to Chinese construction accidents

An Overview of Accident Forecasting Methodologies

Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models

The development history of accident causation models in the past 100 years: 24Model, a more modern accident causation model

Comparative Study of the Hazardous Chemical Transportation Accident Analyses Using the CREAM Model and the 24Model

A review of aircraft fire accident investigation techniques: Research, process, and cases

Study on the reliability of accident analysis results: Taking two groups of four accident analysis references with the 24Model as samples

A new insight into the accident investigation: A case study of Tianjin Port fire and explosion in China

Systems-Based Analysis of China-Tianjin Port Fire and Explosion: A Comparison of HFACS, AcciMap, and STAMP

Comparison of the theoretical elements and application characteristics of STAMP, FRAM, and 24Model: A major hazardous chemical explosion accident

Comparative study of fault tree analysis and 24Model: taking the cause analysis of the Quanzhou Xinjia Hotel collapse accident as an example

Interaction Theory of Hazard-Target System

A review of the research into the relations between hazards in multi-hazard risk analysis

Modeling and evaluation of causal factors in emergency responses to fire accidents involving oil storage system

Hybrid approaches of accident modeling for risk management in socio-technical systems

Integration research on three safety assessment methods

Review of Traffic Accident Reproduction Technology and Its Developing Trend

A modified accident analysis and investigation model for the general aviation industry: Emphasizing on human and organizational factors

Accident causation models: A comparison of SCM and 24Model