Abstract:BackgroundOne goal of structural biology is to understand how a protein’s 3-dimensional conformation determines its capacity to interact with potential ligands. In the case of small chemical ligands, deconstructing a static protein-ligand complex into its constituent atom-atom interactions is typically sufficient to rapidly predict ligand affinity with high accuracy (>70% correlation between predicted and experimentally-determined affinity), a fact that is exploited to support structure-based drug design. We recently found that protein-DNA/RNA affinity can also be predicted with high accuracy using extensions of existing techniques, but protein-protein affinity could not be predicted with >60% correlation, even when the protein-protein complex was available.MethodsX-ray and NMR structures of protein-protein complexes, their associated binding affinities and experimental conditions were obtained from different binding affinity and structural databases. Statistical models were implemented using a generalized linear model framework, including the experimental conditions as new model features. We evaluated the potential for new features to improve affinity prediction models by calculating the Pearson correlation between predicted and experimental binding affinities on the training and test data after model fitting and after cross-validation. Differences in accuracy were assessed using two-sample t test and nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test.ResultsHere we evaluate a range of potential factors that may interfere with accurate protein-protein affinity prediction. We find that X-ray crystal resolution has the strongest single effect on protein-protein affinity prediction. Limiting our analyses to only high-resolution complexes (≤2.5 Å) increased the correlation between predicted and experimental affinity from 54 to 68% (p = 4.32x10−3). In addition, incorporating information on the experimental conditions under which affinities were measured (pH, temperature and binding assay) had significant effects on prediction accuracy. We also highlight a number of potential errors in large structure-affinity databases, which could affect both model training and accuracy assessment.ConclusionsThe results suggest that the accuracy of statistical models for protein-protein affinity prediction may be limited by the information present in databases used to train new models. Improving our capacity to integrate large-scale structural and functional information may be required to substantively advance our understanding of the general principles by which a protein’s structure determines its function.

Are predicted structures good enough to preserve functional sites?

Structure Prediction of Membrane Proteins

Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11

Prediction of Ca binding site in proteins with a fast and accurate method based on statistical mechanics and analysis of crystal structures

Prediction of Ca2+ Binding Site in Proteins With a Fast and Accurate Method Based on Statistical Mechanics and Analysis of Crystal Structures

On the Structural Characteristics of the Protein Active Sites and Their Relation to Thermal Fluctuations

Improved prediction of site-rates from structure with averaging across homologs

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

Improved prediction of site‐rates from structure with averaging across homologs

Navigating the Unstructured by Evaluating AlphaFold's Efficacy in Predicting Missing Residues and Structural Disorder in Proteins

Structure Prediction for the Helical Skeletons Detected from the Low Resolution Protein Density Map

Effective High-Accuracy Prediction of Protein Structures from Easily Obtainable Artificial Homologous Sequences by Structure-Stability-Based Selection

AlphaFold3 versus experimental structures: assessment of the accuracy in ligand-bound G protein-coupled receptors

Progress On Modeling Of Protein Structures And Interactions

More Structures, Less Accuracy: ESM3's Binding Prediction Paradox

Seq-InSite: sequence supersedes structure for protein interaction site prediction

Validating The Network-Based Objective Measure For Helical Membrane Protein Structures

Calcium Ion Binding to the Mutants of Calmodulin: A Structure-Based Computational Predictive Model of Binding Affinity Using a Charge Scaling Approach in Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Improving the accuracy of high-throughput protein-protein affinity prediction may require better training data

Accurate Disulfide-Bonding Network Predictions Improve Ab Initio Structure Prediction of Cysteine-Rich Proteins.

Protein structure prediction: Combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data