Abstract:BackgroundProtein sites evolve at different rates due to functional and biophysical constraints. It is usually considered that the main structural determinant of a site’s rate of evolution is its Relative Solvent Accessibility (RSA). However, a recent comparative study has shown that the main structural determinant is the site’s Local Packing Density (LPD). LPD is related with dynamical flexibility, which has also been shown to correlate with sequence variability. Our purpose is to investigate the mechanism that connects a site’s LPD with its rate of evolution.ResultsWe consider two models: an empirical Flexibility Model and a mechanistic Stress Model. The Flexibility Model postulates a linear increase of site-specific rate of evolution with dynamical flexibility. The Stress Model, introduced here, models mutations as random perturbations of the protein’s potential energy landscape, for which we use simple Elastic Network Models (ENMs). To account for natural selection we assume a single active conformation and use basic statistical physics to derive a linear relationship between site-specific evolutionary rates and the local stress of the mutant’s active conformation.We compare both models on a large and diverse dataset of enzymes. In a protein-by-protein study we found that the Stress Model outperforms the Flexibility Model for most proteins. Pooling all proteins together we show that the Stress Model is strongly supported by the total weight of evidence. Moreover, it accounts for the observed nonlinear dependence of sequence variability on flexibility. Finally, when mutational stress is controlled for, there is very little remaining correlation between sequence variability and dynamical flexibility.ConclusionsWe developed a mechanistic Stress Model of evolution according to which the rate of evolution of a site is predicted to depend linearly on the local mutational stress of the active conformation. Such local stress is proportional to LPD, so that this model explains the relationship between LPD and evolutionary rate. Moreover, the model also accounts for the nonlinear dependence between evolutionary rate and dynamical flexibility.

Improved prediction of site‐rates from structure with averaging across homologs

Improved prediction of site-rates from structure with averaging across homologs

Folding rate prediction based on neural network model

A new formulation of protein evolutionary models that account for structural constraints

Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites

A mechanistic stress model of protein evolution accounts for site-specific evolutionary rates and their relationship with packing density and flexibility

Composition-Based Effective Chain Length For Prediction Of Protein Folding Rates

Prediction of Protein Folding Rates from Structural Topology and Complex Network Properties

Seq-InSite: sequence supersedes structure for protein interaction site prediction

High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement

Are predicted structures good enough to preserve functional sites?

Site-specific structure and stability constrained substitution models improve phylogenetic inference

Optimal coarse-grained site selection in elastic network models of biomolecules

AggreRATE-Pred: a mathematical model for the prediction of change in aggregation rate upon point mutation

Protein structure prediction: Combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data

Accurate Prediction of Protein Folding Rates from Sequence and Sequence-Derived Residue Flexibility and Solvent Accessibility.

Deep Virtual Compton Scattering and the Nucleon Generalized Parton Distributions

Learning effective amino acid interactions through iterative stochastic techniques

Large-Scale Analyses of Site-Specific Evolutionary Rates across Eukaryote Proteomes Reveal Confounding Interactions between Intrinsic Disorder, Secondary Structure, and Functional Domains

Large scale analysis of predicted protein structures links model features to behaviour