Compariment of Thoracolumbar Junction Fractures with Wiltse Approach or Conventional Approach

张锋,张文志,段丽群,李旭,贺瑞
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2013.02.013
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of thoracolumbar fractures treatment through Wiltse approach or conventional approach.Methods A total of 75 patients with thoracolumbar fractures underwent posterior open reduction and internal fixation.35 patients were treated with Wiltse approach,the other 40 were treated with conventional approach.Perioperative parameter,postoperative imaging index,visual analog scale(VAS) were compared between the two group.Results All the cases were followed up for 10 ~18 months(average 15.2months).Wiltse approach had obvious advantages in operative time,hospital stay,blooding loss,volume of drainage.Anterior vertebra height,Cobb’s angle between pre and post operation were all significantly different.Compared between the groups,data did not show significant difference.The VAS score in Wiltse approach was significant less than that in conventional approach group at 1 week,1 month,6 month,and last follow up,while there weren’t significant difference between two groups before the surgery.Conclusion The Wiltse approach has the advantage of less tissue injury,fewer traumas,less pain,easy for pedicle screw insertion,so it’s a better option.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?