Abstract:Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the Wiltse approach and percutaneous pedicle screw placement under O-arm navigation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.Methods We enrolled a total of 54 patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar fracture who received minimally invasive treatments between October 2014 and October 2018 in this retrospective study. Among these, 28 patients (22 males and six females, with a mean age of 48.6 +/- 9.6 years) were treated with pedicle screw fixation through the Wiltse approach (WPSF), and another 26 (15 males and 11 females, with a mean age of 45.7 +/- 10.6 years) received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under O-arm navigation (OPSF). Statistical methods were used to perform a detailed comparison of clinical outcomes, radiologic findings, and complications between the two groups obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, and at last follow-up.Results All patients underwent surgery successfully and finished a follow-up of more than 12 months. No serious complications, such as infection, blood vessel injury, or spinal cord or nerve root injury occurred. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, local Cobb angle (LCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA), and R value were notably improved after surgery, though there was no clear discrepancy between the groups at each time point (P > 0.05). During the follow-up period, no patients developed neurological impairment or implant-related complications, and no patients underwent revision surgery. The WPSF group had a significantly shorter operation time than the OPSF group (68.1 +/- 9.8 vs 76.1 +/- 9.0 minutes, P = 0.005). Moreover, the WPSF group showed less cost of surgery than the WPSF group (48142.1 +/- 1430.1 vs 59035.4 +/- 1152.7 CNY, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the intraoperative bleeding, length of incision, or postoperative hospitalization time (P > 0.05). The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was 95.2% (160/168) in the WPSF group and 96.8% (151/156) in the OPSF group, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.432).Conclusion Both WPSF and OPSF were safe and effective for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. Although the two groups showed favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes through to final follow-up, we recommended the minimally invasive WPSF given its shorter operation time and lower cost of surgery.

Comparison of Pedicle Fixation by the Wiltse Approach and the Conventional Posterior Open Approach for Thoracolumbar Fractures, Using MRI, Histological and Electrophysiological Analyses of the Multifidus Muscle

Influence of Short-Segment Pedicle Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures by Wiltse Approach on the Multifidus Muscle

Comparison Study Between Wiltse Paraspinal Approach and Conventional Approach for Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture.

Compariment of Thoracolumbar Junction Fractures with Wiltse Approach or Conventional Approach

Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcome Between Mini-Open Wiltse Approach and Fluoroscopic-Guided Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the Modified Wiltse's Approach with Spinal Minimally Invasive System and Traditional Approach for the Therapy of Thoracolumbar Fracture

Two Different Surgery Approaches for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture

Comparison Of The Wiltse Approach And Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Under O-Arm Navigation For The Treatment Of Thoracolumbar Fractures

The Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation Versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Percutaneous pedicle screw and Wiltse approach pedicle screw combined with fixation at injured vertebrae in treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures

Comparison of Open Versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Using the Sextant System in the Treatment of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures.

Multiaxial inter-vertebral and vertebral pedicle pedicle screw fixation for spinal fractures: a biomechanical comparative study

The Biomechanical and Clinical Study of the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

A Comparison of the Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures.

The Comparision of Minimally Invasive and Traditional Open Treatment for Thoracolumbar Fractures with Fixation Using Sextant System

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of the Wiltse Paraspinal Approach and O-arm Navigation for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

A Comparison of Outcomes Between the Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Multi‐Segmental Thoracolumbar Fractures

Comparision of minimally invasive percutaneous and traditional open treatment for thoracolumbar fractures with pedicle screw system

The efficacy comparison of percutaneous monoaxial screw and open treatment for treatment ;of thoracolumbar fractures with pedicle screw system

A Retrospective Study Comparing Percutaneous and Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fractures with Spinal Injuries

Biomechanical comparison of posterior intermediate screw fixation techniques with hybrid monoaxial and polyaxial pedicle screws in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture: a finite element study