Meta-analysis of quadriceps-sparing approach versus conventional approach in total knee arthroplasty

LI Can-feng,ZENG Yi,SHEN Bin,PEI Fu-xing,YANG Jing,ZHOU Zong-ke,KANG Peng-de
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2013.06.020
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the quadriceps-sparing(QS) approach with conventional approach in total knee arthroplasty( TKA). Methods The data bases including Cochrane Library,PubMed,EMBASE,CNKI,VIP and Wan Fang were searched for collecting randomized controlled trials( RCTs) comparing the QS approach with the conventional approach in TKA. The study selection,assessment,data collection and analysis were undertaken by two authors independently. The data analysis was performed with Review Manager 5. 2. 0,and the publication bias was evaluated by a funnel plot. Results 11 RCTs were included(8 English and 3 Chinese studies) with 813 knees comparing the QS-TKAs( n = 407) with the conventional TKAs( n = 406). The results suggested that the QS approach had advantages in ambulation,straight leg raising,knee flexion,VAS score,drainage and incision length. Except suffering longer surgical time and tourniquet time in the QS approach,there was no difference in KSS score,the 90° knee flexion time,intraoperative blood loss,total blood loss,radiological measurements,and complications between the two groups. Conclusion For the experienced orthopedic surgeons who went out the learning curve,the QS approach may provide better outcomes and faster recovery than the conventional approach without bad component measurement and complications. However,more high-quality RCTs are required for further investigation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?