Abstract:Background: Measurements are not exact, so that if a measurement is repeated, one would get a different value each time. The spread of these values is the measurement uncertainty. Understanding measurement uncertainty of pulmonary nodules is important for proper interpretation of size and growth measurements. Larger amounts of measurement uncertainty may require longer follow-up intervals to be confident that any observed growth is due to actual growth rather than measurement uncertainty. We examined the influence of nodule features and software algorithm on measurement uncertainty of small, solid pulmonary nodules. Methods: Volumes of 107 nodules were measured on 4-6 repeated computed tomography (CT) scans (Siemens Somatom AS, 100 kVp, 120 mA, 1.0 mm slice thickness reconstruction) prospectively obtained during CT-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy between 2015-2021 at Department of Diagnostic, Molecular, and Interventional Radiology in Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, using two different automated volumetric algorithms. For each, the coefficient of variation (standard deviation divided by the mean) of nodule volume measurements was determined. The following features were considered: diameter, location, vessel and pleural attachments, nodule surface area, and extent of the nodule in the three acquisition dimensions of the scanner. Results: Median volume of 107 nodules was 515.23 and 535.53 mm3 for algorithm #1 and #2, respectively with excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient =0.98). Median coefficient of variation of nodule volume was low for the two algorithms, but significantly different (4.6% vs. 8.7%, P<0.001). Both algorithms had a trend of decreasing coefficient of variation of nodule volume with increasing nodule diameter, though only significant for algorithm #2. Coefficient of variation of nodule volume was significantly associated with nodule volume (P=0.02), attachment to blood vessels (P=0.02), and nodule surface area (P=0.001) for algorithm #2 using a multiple linear regression model. Correlation between the coefficient of variation (CoV) of nodule volume and the CoV of the x, y, z measurements for algorithm #1 were 0.29 (P=0.0021), 0.25 (P=0.009), and 0.80 (P<0.001) respectively, and for algorithm #2, 0.46 (P<0.001), 0.52 (P<0.001), and 0.58 (P<0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Even in the best-case scenario represented in this study, using the same measurement algorithm, scanner, and scanning protocol, considerable measurement uncertainty exists in nodule volume measurement for nodules sized 20 mm or less. We found that measurement uncertainty was affected by interactions between nodule volume, algorithm, and shape complexity.

Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules at Low-Dose Chest CT: Effect of Reconstruction Setting on Measurement Variability

Effects of Different Reconstruction Parameters on CT Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules

[Effect of Scanning and Reconstruction Parameters on Three Dimensional Volume and CT Value Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules: A Phantom Study].

Detection And Size Measurements Of Pulmonary Nodules In Ultra-Low-Dose Ct With Iterative Reconstruction Compared To Low Dose

Effect of Nodule Characteristics on Variability of Semiautomated Volume Measurements in Pulmonary Nodules Detected in a Lung Cancer Screening Program

Evaluation of Three-dimensional Volume Measurements of Pulmonary Nodules with 64-detector CT Compared with Two-dimensional Measurements

Small Irregular Pulmonary Nodules in Low-Dose CT: Observer Detection Sensitivity and Volumetry Accuracy

Assessing the impact of nodule features and software algorithm on pulmonary nodule measurement uncertainty for nodules sized 20 mm or less

Detection and size quantification of pulmonary nodules in ultralow-dose versus regular-dose CT: a comparative study in COPD patients

Sensitivity and Accuracy of Volumetry of Pulmonary Nodules on Low-Dose 16- and 64-Row Multi-Detector CT: an Anthropomorphic Phantom Study

Reproducibility of Volumetric Computed Tomography of Stable Small Pulmonary Nodules with Implications on Estimated Growth Rate and Optimal Scan Interval.

Detectability and Volumetric Accuracy of Pulmonary Nodules in Low-Dose Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography: an Anthropomorphic Phantom Study.

SU‐E‐T‐40: Exploring the Reproducibility of Tumor Volumes Measured by Radiologist, Computer‐Aided Radiologist and Computer Alone

Effect of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (Asir-V) Levels on Ultra-Low-dose CT Radiomics Quantification in Pulmonary Nodules.

Ultra-low-dose Spectral-Detector Computed Tomography for the Accurate Quantification of Pulmonary Nodules: an Anthropomorphic Chest Phantom Study.

Different Lung Nodule Detection Tasks at Different Dose Levels by Different Computed Tomography Image Reconstruction Strategies

A Task-Dependent Investigation on Dose and Texture in CT Image Reconstruction

Consistency of radiologists in identifying pulmonary nodules based on low-dose computed tomography.

Detecting Pulmonary Nodules with Two Reconstruction Slice Thickness in 16-Slice Low Dose Helical CT

Impact on Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Layer Detector Spectral CT for Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules: Comparison With Hybrid and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction

Evaluation of the volume of pulmonary nodules with LungCARE software