Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

The Relationship Between Stock Index Futures and the Volatility of Stock Market

Prediction of Volatility Based on Realized-Garch-kernel-type Models: Evidence from China and the U.S.

Chinese Stock Market Volatility and the Role of U.S. Economic Variables

Forecasting Stock Volatility Using Time-Distance Weighting Fundamental’s Shocks

The Impact of Price Discovery and Volatility Spillovers of Index Futures on Stock Index in China

Index futures trading and stock market volatility in China: A difference-in-difference approach

The Impact of Index Futures on Spot Market Volatility in China

Effect of Stock Index Futures Introduction on Stock Spot Market Volatility

The Study of Hedging Ratios of Stock Index Futures in China

Estimation of stock market index volatility using the GARCH model: Causality between stock indices

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Coupling Effect Between HS300 Index Futures Market and Stock Index Futures Market Home and Abroad

Research on relationships between volatility and returns, trading volume, open interest in Chinese futures market

Test on relationship between Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 stock index and index futures

Effects of Futures Introduction on Market Volatility and Information Transmission

Volatility analysis based on GARCH-type models: Evidence from the Chinese stock market

The Impact of Trading Restrictions and Margin Requirements on Stock Index Futures

Empirical Analysis of Interdependency and Volatility among Asian Stock Markets

Empirical Analysis of the Volatility of Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index and Factors Influencing Stock Returns——Based on EEMD and VAR Model

Stock index futures trading impact on spot price volatility. The CSI 300 studied with a TGARCH model

An Empirical Analysis of the Volatility in the Open-End Fund Market: Evidence from China