Abstract:Introduction Although the disclosure of medical errors is an integral component of medical ethics, it remains inconsistent in practice worldwide. Despite various explanations of why healthcare professionals reveal their mistakes to patients, comprehensive comparisons and evaluations of this topic remain lacking. The objective of this review is to evaluate the experience of medical error disclosure among medical professionals who have been involved in such errors. Methods and analysis This work will focus on studies involving medical professionals from various countries who work in hospital settings and have obtained an understanding of and firsthand experience with medical error disclosure. This review will include qualitative studies. Studies published in databases such as PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, OVID, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and Cochrane Library from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2024 will be searched as part of this research. Additionally, OpenGrey will be searched manually to obtain supplementary information. The search will be conducted starting in May 2024 and will include both Chinese-language and English-language literature. The systematic review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence and use the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information online program. Study authenticity will be investigated via the Qualitative Research Authenticity Evaluation Tool provided by the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Centre, and data extraction will be performed via the Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument data extraction tool. The results will be integrated via a pooled integration methodology and evaluated in terms of reliability via the ConQual qualitative systematic evaluation evidence grading tool. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for the study because the review will be based on pre-existing data available in the literature. The results of this systematic review will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024494360.

Research on the Secrecy Medical Error Reporting System

On the Medical Servlce Model Highlighting Quality of Care and Patient Safety

Enlightens of Medical Risk Management in American and Hospital Build in China

Management Strategy Study on Medication Errors of Concentrated Potassium Chloride Injection Based on Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

Medical staff's risk management trainin0 and its effective evaluation

Disclosure of medical errors to patients by medical professionals: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review

Ethical Thinking on Enhancing Management in Medical Safety

Development of healthcare-associated infection risk management and early-warning system based on failure mode and effect analysis model

Public reporting in health care:learning from the United States

The Unsafe Incident Reporting System: Patient's Safeguard

Practice and experience of postoperative complications reporting system

Influence Factors and Countermeasures of Patient Safety Events Reporting

Risk management in the Emergency Department

Improving the Quality of the Data in the Medical Record Management System

Barriers to reporting near misses and adverse events among professionals performing laparoscopic surgeries: a mixed methodology approach

Investigation and analysis of medication errors in Beijing Water Resounes Hospital from 2014 to 2016

Perceptions of Medical Error among General Practitioners in Rural China: a Qualitative Interview Study

A privacy protection method for health care big data management based on risk access control

Analysis and Countermeasures of Quality Defects Reasons of Running Medical Records

[Analysis on Evaluation of Medical Device Adverse Events Monitoring and Some Factors Influencing MDAE's Reporting by Medical Personnels].

Exploration and Practice of the Management of High-risk Medicines in Our Hospital