Predictive Value to Depressive Symptoms of Perfectionism Dimensions in College Students

ZHANG Bin,CAI Tai-sheng,LUO Xing-wei,ZHU Hong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.01.022

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective: The dual model of perfectionism was adopted to explore the influence of different perfectionism dimensions on depression.Methods: A total of 206 undergraduate students were selected by convenient sampling and asked to complete the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-Chinese Revised(FMPS),the Hewitt Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-Chinese Revised(HMPS),Almost Perfect Scale-Chinese Revised(APS-R),the Beck Depression Inventory(BDI),the Rosenberg self-esteem Scale(SES),the General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES),the State Anxiety Inventory(SAI) and the Positive and Negative Affection Scale(PANAS)(Time 1),and the Beck Depression Inventory four months later(Time 2).Results: Partial correlations analyses revealed that maladaptive perfectionism was related to psychopathology(Pr=0.36,0.46,0.58;P<0.001) whereas adaptive perfectionism was closely correlated with positive features of mental health(Pr=0.22,0.32,0.33;P<0.01).In cross-sectional analyses,the discrepancy and the social-prescribed perfectionism subscales of maladaptive perfectionism could significantly predict baseline depressive symptoms(β=0.372,P<0.001;β=0.264,P<0.01),while none of adaptive perfectionism subscales could predict depression(P>0.05).In longitudinal analyses,none of perfectionism subscales significantly predicted the change in depression across a four-month lag(P>0.05).Conclusion: The results support the dual process model of perfectionism.The discrepancy and the social prescribed perfectionism subscales of maladaptive perfectionism can significantly predict depression.