Safty and instant effects of of drug-eluting stent versus bare metal stent implantation following emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

MingDe Zhang,Cao Ying-jiang,Bu Jian-xue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2009.22.010
2009-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stent has been widely used to treat coronary artery stenosis, with promising effect. However, little is know about the application in acute myocardial infarction in emergency. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of Firebird drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents implantation after the emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEAMI). DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: Retrospective analysis. The cases were selected from Department of Cardiology, Luoyang 150 Hospital between January 2006 and September 2008. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 94 STEAMI patients undergoing direct PCI in Department of Cardiology, Luoyang 150 Hospital were selected, including 71 males, 23 females aged 47-76 years. METHODS: The 94 cases were randomly divided into two groups, Firebird group (n=52) undergoing 1 or 2 Firebird stents at target lesion, and BMS group (n=42) implanted with 1 or 2 bare metal stents at target lesion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The safety, clinical efficacy and the follow-up information were observed. RESULTS: Of the 94 cases, all PCI operations were successful with 68 Firebird drug-eluting stents in Firebird group and 56 BMS in BMS group. There were no significant differences in implanted stents quantity, operation achievement ratio, PCI complication incidence rate, mean stenosis degree of pre or post operation and PCI duration (P > 0.05). While the average inner diameter of Firebird drug-eluting stents was smaller than BMS group (P < 0 01), and the length of Firebird drug-eluting stents was longer than BMS group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences with myocardial creatase peak value, TnI peak value, ST-segment descent 2 hours after blood vessel unobstructed and left ventricular function between Firebird group and BMS group (P > 0.05). There was 1 case with the target vessel reconstruction in Firebird group and 2 cases in BMS group (P > 0.05). There were 2 cases death in both group, and the heart event rate between two groups without significant difference (P > 0.05). The length of stays of two groups was similar [(11.3±4.2) days, (12.4±4.6) days, P > 0.05]. During the (6.5±2.4) month (range 1 to 10 months) follow-up, the angina incidence rate of the Firebird group was lower than the BMS group (21.0%, 35 5%, P < 0.01), and without heart event rate of the Firebird group was higher than the BMS group (95%, 78%, P < 0.01). No cardiac death or re-infarction took place in both groups. CONCLUSION: Implantation of Firebird drug-eluting stent after the emergency PCI is as safe and effective as the conventional bare metal stent in patients with STEAMI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?