Abstract:BACKGROUND As a kind of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) made in China, Firebird SES is more effective than bare metal stent (BMS) and not inferior to Cypher SES for short coronary lesions in terms of reduction of restenosis and revascularization. However, Firebird SES does not show any benefits in patients with a very long coronary lesion (VLCL). The present study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Firebird SES for VLCL by comparison of Cypher SES and BMS. METHODS In this prospective, nonrandomized and comparative study, eligible patients with de novo coronary lesion (> or = 30 mm) between January 2005 and June 2006 were allocated into Firebird SES group, Cypher SES group or BMS group. They were subjected to an angiographic follow-up of 6 months and a clinical follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoints constitute the in-stent and in-segment restenosis rates at 6 months. The secondary endpoint was defined as a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) that was a 12-month combined endpoint of all-cause deaths, reinfarction or in-stent thrombosis, and target-lesion revascularization. The 12-month in-stent thrombosis was also evaluated to address the safety of Firebird SES implantation exceptionally. RESULTS A total of 468 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of 113 patients who were finally included according to the prior inclusion and exclusion criteria, 39 (41 lesions) were treated with Firebird SES, 37 (39 lesions) with Cypher SES, and 37 (37 lesions) with BMS. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the three groups; but there were longer lesions, more frequent use of overlapping stent in the Firebird SES group and the Cypher SES group. Angiographic follow-up showed that the rates of binary stenosis were similar between the Firebird SES group and the Cypher SES group (in-segment: 14.6% vs 12.8%, relative risk (RR) 1.14, P = 0.81; in-stent: 9.8% vs 10.3%, RR 0.95, P = 0.94), and significantly lower than those in the BMS group (in-segment: vs. 36.1%, RR 0.41 or 0.36, P = 0.04 or 0.03, respectively; in-stent: vs 30.6%, RR 0.32 or 0.34, P = 0.03 or 0.04, respectively). The total MACE rate up to 12 months was also similar in both SES groups (7.7% vs 5.4%, P = 1.000), and significantly lower than that in the BMS group (27.0%, P = 0.034 or 0.024, respectively). The in-stent thrombosis rate in the follow-up period was 2.6% in the Firebird SES group, not higher in the Cypher SES and BMS groups (2.7% and 2.7%, respectively, P = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS In the treatment of VLCL, Firebird SES would be safer and more effective than BMS. Firebird SES may be not inferior to Cypher SES in terms of restenosis and MACE.

Long Term Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Made Sirolimus Eluting Stents: Results, Including off Label Usage, from Two Centres over Three Years

A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial

Safety and Efficacy of the Cypher Select Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in the "real World" - Clinical and Angiographic Results from the China Cypher Select Registry

Efficacy and Safety of Firebird Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Treatment of Complex Coronary Lesions in Chinese Patients: One-Year Clinical and Eight-Month Angiographic Outcomes from the FIREMAN Registry.

Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Treated with Domestic Sirolimus-Eluting Partner Coronary Stent

Sirolimus-eluting Cobalt Alloyed Stents in Treating Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Six-Month Angiographic and One-Year Clinical Follow-Up Result A Prospective, Historically Controlled, Multi-Center Clinical Study

Sirolimus-eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stents: Two-Year Clinical Results from First-in-man Study on the Firebird 2TM Stent

AS-152: Clinical Outcomes of Patients with ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction Treated with 3 Types of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: 1-Year Follow-Up Results

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Abluminal Groove-Filled Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions: 12-Month Results from the TARGET II Trial.

One-year Clinical Outcomes of Domestic Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Treating Unselected Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Six-month Clinical Outcomes of Firebird 2TM Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Real-World Patients with Coronary Artery Diseases

Long-Term Effects of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents on Patients with Acute St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Outcomes of 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up

Firebird Sirolimus Eluting Stent Versus Bare Mental Stent in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Study of long-term safety and efficacy of domestic Firebird rapamycin-eluting stent

Firebird and Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Treatment of Very Long Coronary Lesions

Clinical effects of Firebird stent and Yinyi stent implantation in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes

Short and Intermediate Term Clinical Outcome of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Nine-month Angiographic and Two-year Clinical Follow-up of Novel Biodegradable-polymer Arsenic Trioxide-eluting Stent Versus Durable-polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent for Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Biodegradable Polymer‐based Sirolimus‐eluting Stents in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Insight from the 4‐year Results of the Create Study

[Impact of Coronary Sirolimus-Eluting Stents on Long-Term Outcome in Diabetic Patients].

Safety and Efficacy of the Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients with Lesions in Small Native Coronary Arteries