One-year Clinical Outcomes of Domestic Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Treating Unselected Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Q Zhang,RY Zhang,J Hu,JS Zhang,ZK Yang,J Ni,GP Lu,WF Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2006.04.002
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective We investigated the safety and one-year clinical outcomes of Chinese sirolimus-eluting Firebird stents in the treatment of unselected patients with coronary artery disease, and compared to those receiving Cypher or Taxus stents. Methods and Results From May 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004, a total of 673 consecutive patients with de novo coronary lesions were randomized to Firebird (n=224, Firebird group), Cypher (n=246, Cypher group) and Taxus (n=203, Taxus group) stent treatment. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization were recorded. The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics among the three groups were similar. Although the number of stents implanted per patient was greater and total stented length was longer in Firebird group compared with Cypher and Taxus groups, the cost of hospitalization was significantly lower. The incidence of MACE at one-year follow-up was 9.0% in Firebird group, 8.4% in Cypher group and 11.2% in Taxus group respectively (P all 0.05). Angiographically identified stent thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (0.9%) in Firebird group, 2 patients (0.9%) in Cypher group and 3 patients (1.6%) in Taxus group. Conclusion Implantation of the Firebird stent in unselected patients with coronary artery disease is safe and has shown no inferiority in one-year clinical outcomes compared to the Cypher or Taxus stents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?