Clinical Contrast Investigation of Firebird and Cypher Rapamycin Eluting Stent

TANG Qiang,GUO Lai-jing,HU Dayi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-583x.2006.24.003
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study and contrast the clinical efficacy of domestic and imported rapamycin drug eluting stent(DES).Methods Two hundred and twenty-two patients in the department from Aug 2003 to Apr 2006 were included.These patients were divided into three groups,58 patients underwent coronary artery stent with Firebird DES(Firebird group),168 patients with Cypher DES(Cypher group) and another 56 patients with Bare mental stent(BMS group).The instant and short term follow-up outcomes were compared among the three groups.Results The differences of mean age,male ratio,smoking history,hypertension,hyperlipemia,diabetes,stable angina,unstable angina,acute STsegment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI),non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI) and old myocardial infarction were no statistic significance among three groups(P0.05).The differences of target vessel diameter and target lesion length were no statistic significance among three groups(P0.05).The differences of single vessel disease,two-vessel disease, three-vessel disease,bifurcate lesion,chronic total occlusion lesion and left main lesion were no statistic significance among three groups(P0.05).The procedural successful rate 100%,follow up rates(87.9% vs 89.3% vs 89.3%) were not significant statistically among three groups(P0.05).Clinic follow up 3-12 months,as compared with Firebird group,patients in BMS group had more major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE),higher occurrence rates of restenosis and target vessel revascularization(P0.01).However,there were no significant differences between Firebird group and Cypher group in any of these parameters.Conclusion The Firebird DES is safe and effective in treating coronary artery lesions with similar outcomes of the Cypher DES,and has low rate of restenosis and MACE comparing the BMS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?