Abstract:The research on criminal responsibility in China has been slowed down in recent years,and we cannot transcend the level we have reached. In author's opinion, the most important reason of such situation is that theories on criminal responsibility only put their eyes on penalty, so that theories on criminal responsibility and theories on penalty are almost the same. If so, it is not necessary for theories on criminal responsibility to exist, theories on penalty will take their place.However, the emergence of VOM (victim-offender mediation) has shown another possible understanding of criminal responsibility, and will broaden our horizons about it. This paper discusses the new concept of criminal responsibility in VOM's view, including the premise, subjects, objects, varied measures, and aims of criminal responsibility. In detail, in view of VOM, the premise of criminal responsibility is that the offenders have relatively free will.The primary subject to assume responsibility is the offender, but at the same time, the community is also responsible for the event. They are responsible to the victim and the community, not to the state. The measures to realize criminal responsibility include compensation, apology and community labor. The aim of these measures is to restore all parties. VOM itself will be an important criminal sanction different from penalty. Accordingly, the methods for the offenders to undertake their criminal responsibility will be penalty, security measures, and VOM, not only penalty and security measures which we usually thought them to be.This paper analyses in detail the relationship among these three methods, especially their differences. At last, this paper discusses the aims of criminal responsibility. As far as we know, punishment and prevention are the two goals of criminal responsibility. VOM shows us a promising future that restoration grows to be one of the goals of criminal responsibility. The paper analyses in detail the relationship among these three goals.

The Concept of Act and the Concept of Actor in the System of Criminal Participation

Reconsideration of Distribution of Liabilities of Crime Committed by an Entity

On the Formal Structure of Unit Crime

Misunderstandings and Corrections of Fraud Accomplices in Helping Withdrawals

On the Basic Philosophy of Criminal Reconciliation——Comparative Study between Zhejiang "Fengqiao Experience" and U.S. VOR Model

A Comprehensive Critic on the Unitary System of Complicity

Joint Commission of a Crime

Two Models of Unitary System of Complicity

Problems with the Theory of Anti-Value Acts: Including A Discussion with Professor Zhou Guangquan

A Tentative Study on the Personification of the Criminal Justice

The Evolution of the Concept of "Person" in Criminal Jurisprudence

Study on the Functions of Criminal Procedure

Criminal Mediation and Traditional Theory of Criminal Responsibility

On the Establishment of the Principle of Individual Criminal Responsibility in the International Criminal Law

Theory of Criminal Constitutive Elements:Relationship Confusion and Conquer

The Practice on Criminal Integration

Personal and Collective Culpability Judgment

The Participation of Qualification Offender:from the Perspective of Comparative Law

Oneself-offender and Bribery

The Criminal Composition: Value Conflict and System Construction

Culture and institutional agency: Difference in judgments of economic behavior and organizational responsibilities