Abstract:Purpose: Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) is a medical imaging system for sharing, storage, retrieval, and access of medical images stored. Our study aimed to identify ophthalmologists' views on PACS, with the comparison between 3 platforms, namely electronic patient record (ePR), HEYEX (Heidelberg Engineering, Switzerland), and FORUM (Zeiss, US), following their implementation in an eye hospital for common ophthalmic investigations [visual field, optical coherence tomography (OCT) of retinal nerve fiber layer and macula, and fluorescein/indocyanine green angiography (FA/ICG)]. Methods: An online survey was distributed among ophthalmologists in a single center. Primary outcome included comparison of PACS with paper-based system. Secondary outcomes included pattern of use and comparison of different PACS platforms. Results: Survey response rate was 28/37 (75.7%). Images were most commonly accessed through ePR (median: 80% of time, interquartile range: 50 to 90%).All systems scored highly in information display items (median scores ≥7.5 out of 10) and in reducing patient identification error in investigation filing and retrieval during consultation compared to paper (score ≥7.0). However, ePR was inferior to paper in "facilitating comparison with previous results" in all investigation types (scores 3.0 to 4.5). ePR scored significantly higher in all system quality items than HEYEX ( P < 0.001) and FORUM ( P < 0.022), except login response time ( P = 0.081). HEYEX scored significantly higher among vitreoretinaluveitis members (VRU) for information quality items for OCT macula and FA/ICG [VRU: 10.0 (8.0 to 10.0), non-VRU: 8.0 (6.75 to 9.25), P = 0.042]. Conclusions: Overall feedback for PACS among ophthalmologists was positive, with limitations of inefficiency in use of information, for example, comparison with previous results. Subspecialty played an important role in evaluating PACS.

Quality Monitoring of Root Canal Therapy with PACS: a Pilot Study

Preliminary Research on Quality Control of PACS Image Display Device

Study of Archives Management and Transmission for DICOM Medical Images

The Cost and Efficacy Analysis of PACS in Community Health Service Center

Investigation and analysis on application of PACS clinical clients

The application of PACS/RIS in daily work of radiologist

Application of Picture Achieving and Communicating System in the Practice Learning of Medical Imaging

Usage Status of Periapical Films Undertaking in Root Canal Treatment

Application of Picture Achieving Communication System in Radiology Teaching

Implementation and Evaluation of PACS Workflow Monitoring Programme

Resolve Scheme of Medical Image Archiving in PACS

Discussion the system of medical PACS

Survey-based Evaluation of the Use of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in an Eye Hospital-Ophthalmologists' Perspective

Influence of process model and hospital management work of the Department of imaging PACS

Application of case based learning rounds with PACS in the training of radiology clinicians

[Effect of Quality of Root Canal Obturation on the Long-Term Results of Root Canal Therapy].

Assessment of the canal fillings using cone beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography

Design and Application of a Quality Control System for a Network of Radiotherapy

Implementing a quality framework for storing emergency department point-of-care ultrasound examinations on a picture archiving and communication system

Evaluation of network attached storage technique in PACS clinical application

Medical image archiving and communication systems(PACS) and its clinical application