The Early Osseointegration of the Laser-Treated and Acid-Etched Dental Implants Surface: an Experimental Study in Rabbits

Mingdeng Rong,Lei Zhou,Zehong Gou,Andi Zhu,Dongfeng Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3730-4
2009-01-01
Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine
Abstract:The aim of the study was to evaluate early osseointegration of the laser-treated and acid-etched implant surface after the installation in rabbit tibias for 4 weeks. A total of 56 screw-shaped implants were grouped as follows: group A: implants were turned surface; group B: implants were laser-treated surface; group C: implants were acid-etched; group D: Implants were laser-treated and acid-etched surface. After 4 weeks, the removal torques were: group A: 13.21 ± 11.30 Ncm; group B: 29.73 ± 8.32 Ncm; group C: 30.31 ± 9.45 Ncm; group D: 35.76 ± 7.58 Ncm; The averages of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were as follows: group A: 27.30 ± 6.55%; group B: 38.00 ± 8.56%; group C: 42.71 ± 8.48%; group D: 49.71 ± 9.21%. The removal torque and bone-to-implant contact measurements yielded statistically significant differences between the treated groups and turned group (P < 0.05); The laser-treated and acid-etched surface achieved higher Bone-to-Implant Contact than the laser-treated surface (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the laser-treated and acid-etched surface and the acid-etched surface in bone-to-implant contact (P > 0.05). In the present study, it was concluded that the laser-treated and acid-etched implants had good osteoconductivity and was a potential material for dental implantation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?