Antidumping and other trade disputes
Chad P Bown,Shenggen Fan,Ravi Kanbur,Shang-Jin Wei,Xiaobo Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678204.003.0017
2014-01-01
Abstract:Antidumping is an import-restricting policy. National governments ultimately administer and apply antidumping subject to the guidance of international rules. Antidumping use has been permitted under both the 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Article VI and since 1995 under the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Antidumping.‘Appropriate’use of antidumping can ultimately be enforceable under the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding. The three primary legal elements that governments must satisfy in order to justify imposition of new antidumping trade barriers are that (1) there are ‘dumped’imports,(2) there is ‘injury’to a domestic industry that produces a competing product, and (3) the dumped imports are a significant cause of that injury. Evidence of dumping requires one of three forms—an exporting firm charging a price in a foreign market that is (i) lower than a constructed measure of its costs,(ii) lower than the selling price of the same good in its home market, or (iii) lower than the selling price of the same good in a third market. Evidence of injury to the domestic industry can be justified through any number of traditional economic indicators, such as a reduction in domestic industry profits, sales, employment, capacity utilization, etc.Despite antidumping laws being around for more than a century and their legal appearance as a well-articulated policy instrument, economists have difficulty positing a rationale for their existence. First, the legal criterion for ‘dumping’penalizes the kind of profit-maximizing behaviour (eg price discrimination, short-run pricing below average cost) that many legal systems in market …