Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Stock price response to order imbalance and change of volume

Research on Stock Return and Liquidity Based on Order Imbalance in Shanghai A-Share Market

Study of Price Impact Cost Based on Limit Order Book Observations

Order Imbalance Beta and Stock Returns

Order Imbalance and Stock Returns: New Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market

Order flow dynamics around extreme price changes on an emerging stock market

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Dynamic Analysis of Liquidity in the Shanghai Stock Exchange Based on Market Capitalization Scale

Order imbalances and market efficiency: New evidence from the Chinese stock market

The Price Impact of Generalized Order Flow Imbalance

Order Flow,Liquidity and Flight on the Stock Market

Will Order Imbalances Predict Stock Returns in Extreme Market Situations? Evidence from China

Price Recovery after Soared and Slump

The Information of Stock Price in Response to the Volume of Circulating Common Stocks

Stylized facts of price gaps in limit order books: Evidence from Chinese stocks

Market Crowds' Trading Behaviors, Agreement Prices, and the Implications of Trading Volume

Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market

Trading information,order book transparency and investors＇ order submission strategies

The Price Impact of Order Book Events

Institutional trading in volatile markets: Evidence from Chinese stock markets

Power-law Tails in the Distribution of Order Imbalance