Abstract:We propose a model-free omnibus statistical procedure to check whether the direction of changes in an economic variable is predictable using the history of its past changes. A class of separate inference procedures are also given to gauge possible sources of directional predictability. They can reveal information about whether the direction of future changes is predictable using the direction, level, volatility, skewness, and kurtosis of past changes. An important feature of the proposed procedures is that they check many lags simultaneously, which is particularly suitable for detecting the alternatives whose directional dependence is small at each lag but it carries over a long distributional lag. At the same time, the tests naturally discount higher order lags, which is consistent with the conventional wisdom that financial markets are more influenced by the recent past events than by the remote past events. We apply the proposed procedures to four daily U.S. stock price indices. We find overwhelming evidence that the directions of excess stock returns are predictable using past excess stock returns, and the evidence is stronger for the directional predictability of large excess stock returns. In particular, the direction and level of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with any threshold, and the volatility, skewness and kurtosis of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with nonzero thresholds (i.e., large returns). The well-known strong volatility clustering together with weak serial dependence in mean cannot completely explain all documented directional predictability for stock returns. To exploit the economic significance of the documented directional predictability for stock returns, we consider a class of autologit models for directional forecasts and find that they have significant out-of-sample directional predictive power. Some trading strategies based on these models and their combinations can earn significant out-of-sample extra risk-adjusted returns over the buy-and-hold trading strategy.

Order Imbalance and Stock Returns: New Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market

Will Order Imbalances Predict Stock Returns in Extreme Market Situations? Evidence from China

Order imbalances and market efficiency: New evidence from the Chinese stock market

Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market

Sources of the Stock Price Fluctuations in Chinese Equity Market

The Dispersion of Beta Estimates and the Investors’ Heterogeneous Beliefs：Evidence from the Stock Market in China

Price Nonsynchronicity, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Expected Stock Returns in China

Power-law Tails in the Distribution of Order Imbalance

Short-Term Price Contrarian and Volume Effect in China's Stock Market

Institutional trading in volatile markets: Evidence from Chinese stock markets

Has Chinese Stock Market Become Efficient? Evidence From A New Approach

Are the Directions of Stock Price Changes Predictable ? Statistical Theory and Evidence

The Price Impact of Generalized Order Flow Imbalance

Reference Price Distributions and Stock Returns: an Analysis Based on the Disposition Effect

Option Trading and the Cross‐listed Stock Returns: Evidence from Chinese A–H Shares

Profitability of return and volume-based investment strategies in China's stock market

Empirical regularities of order placement in the Chinese stock market

Overnight Return Reversal in the Chinese Stock Market

Tracking Retail and Institutional Investors Activity in China

Do Behavioral Biases Affect Order Aggressiveness?

Volume and stock returns in the Chinese market