Abstract:Aim: To evaluate and compare the effect of impregnated retraction cord vs Laser on gingival attachment level and pain perception following retraction for subgingival margins. Settings and design: Many methods for achieving and measuring the amount of gingival retraction in fixed prosthodontic work have been advocated. Though the gingival attachment level is crucial in Periodontology, the literature available regarding the effect of these retraction methods on the same is scarce. Hence, this clinical study was designed to compare the pain perception and amount of gingival recession when impregnated cord and laser were used for retraction. Materials and methods: In 40 subjects (age range of 20 to 40 years) with single missing maxillary incisor, the abutments were prepared with subgingival margins, to receive a full coverage metal-ceramic fixed dental prosthesis. The gingiva was retracted on one of the abutments with impregnated retraction cord and on the other with diode laser. Gingival attachment levels were compared at six sites per abutment using superimposition of digital scans, preoperative and four weeks after cementation of final prosthesis. Statistical analysis used: Statistical analysis of the data for gingival recession was done using t-test. Pain perception was analysed with Chi-square test. Pain perception by patients following retraction was compared with VAS scale. Results: The average values of gingival recession on buccal side were 0.61 mm and 0.38 mm and on the palatal side were 0.58 mm and 0.35 mm for impregnated retraction cord and laser respectively. The P values of <0.01 indicated a highly significant difference between the two groups. Intragroup comparison did not show significant differences between various sites. Pain and discomfort produced by cord method was moderate in comparison with mild/no pain with diode laser and the difference was highly significant.Conclusion: Retraction cord produced more gingival recession than the diode laser, which was statistically highly significant on both buccal and palatal aspects of the teeth. Patients experience with diode laser technique was less painful in comparison with retraction cord method.

Clinical Evaluation Gingival Retraction Cord for Preventing Overhanging Dental Restoration

Application of gingival retraction cord to the restoration of subgingival wedge-shaped defect.

The effect of occlusal interference on the restoration of the idiopathic cervical lesions

Clinical evaluation of restoring posterior teeth residual roots and crowns with crown lengthening surgery

Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords

Long-term stability of periodontal root coverage procedures for gingival recession

The clinical effect of different gingival retraction methods in subgingival non-carious cervical lesions

A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health

The technique of using gingival retraction cords for gingival protection

Changes of nickel and chromium contents in gingival tissue and gingival crevicular fluid after porcelain-fused-to-nichrome crown restoration

Clinical Application of knitted Retraction Cords during Fixed Prosthodontic Treatment

Effects of periodontal tissue in the gingival retraction before the cementation of zirconia ceramic crowns on an-terior teeth

Comparative evaluation of the effect of impregnated retraction cord versus laser on gingival attachment level and pain perception following retraction for subgingival margins - A prospective, split-mouth, controlled, clinical study

Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords

Quantification of growth factors in advanced platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth factors and their clinical efficiency as adjunctive to the GTR procedure in periodontal intrabony defects

Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review

Effect of three different expansion methods on the level of AST and ALP in gingival crevicular fluid

[Clinical effectiveness evaluation of gingival recession by using perioscope as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy]

Clinical evaluation of resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) intracanal posts for primary incisor restoration. Randomized controlled clinical trial

Comparison of acidic and neutral PH root conditioners prior to a coronally positioned flap to treat gingival recession

Efficacy of Conventional versus Cordless Displacement System on Gingival Retraction for Use with Intra-Oral Scanner: A Clinical Study