Abstract:Although we know that the most favourable situation for preparations margins is above gingiva, it has been proven that in numerous clinical cases, this situation is modified in an apical direction and becomes subgingival. This location of the margins then becomes unfavourable from a periodontal point of view as well as in the control of adaptation. However, the major problem arises when the impression is taken. In fact, the marginal gingiva constitutes an obstacle to the access of the impression material to these margins. Nevertheless, numerous techniques allow the free marginal gingiva to be retracted under such conditions that the principal aim can be reached without injuring the conjunctive epithelio-connection. The procedures used to retract the gingiva are either mechanical, chemico-mechanical or surgical. The mechanical techniques may use copper bands and ring collars, the latter being the procedure of choice when indicated. Another technique uses retraction cords, providing a gingival sulcus enlargement without using impregnated cords with haemostatic or astringent solutions. This last technique, nonetheless, must be avoided if there is a risk that might lead to bleeding when the cord is removed. The second retraction technique uses these same cords impregnated with haemostatic or astringent solutions. It seems that 15.5% ferric sulfate impregnated braided cords represent the procedure of choice, allowing both the retraction of the sulcus and the total absence of bleeding, since haemostasis is ensured definitively via the situ application of the pure product. The final technique is the gingival surgery. It may use Ingraham's diamonds that simultaneously finish the subgingival preparation margins and make a superficial epithelium curettage. Following this surgical retraction, haemostasis is ensured, but the rotative instrument used provides, at once, the best profile of the internal wall of the free marginal gingiva for the impression. The second procedure is electro-surgery which provides constant results when use, thereof, is well indicated. Finally, the CO2 laser can also provide another possibility for surgical retraction. Nonetheless, it seems that the CO2 laser is not the best procedure, given the difficulties in directing it. Depending on the case, all these techniques allow the expected results to be obtained, but, unfortunately, their innocuity is not absolute. In fact, it is proven that following any type of gingival retraction, a lesion is caused both by the practitioner and the equipment used, which thus, leads to a loss of about 1/10th millimeter in the height of the free marginal gingiva.

The clinical effect of different gingival retraction methods in subgingival non-carious cervical lesions

The effect of occlusal interference on the restoration of the idiopathic cervical lesions

Clinical evaluation of restoring posterior teeth residual roots and crowns with crown lengthening surgery

The treatment effect of different subgingival flushing in extrasyphilitic periodontitis

Long-term stability of periodontal root coverage procedures for gingival recession

Long‐term Stability of Root Coverage Procedures for Single Gingival Recessions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Clinical Evaluation Gingival Retraction Cord for Preventing Overhanging Dental Restoration

Application of gingival retraction cord to the restoration of subgingival wedge-shaped defect.

Effects of periodontal tissue in the gingival retraction before the cementation of zirconia ceramic crowns on an-terior teeth

[Clinical Evaluation of Gingival Composite Resin Restoring Cervical Defects in Anterior Teeth].

Comparation of the Clinical Effects of Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Composite Resin on the Restoration of Dental Wedge-Shaped Defects

Comparison of treatment effect between periodontal subgingival scaling with the special series of ultrasonic inserts and Gracey curette

[A Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Treatment Effect Using Periodontal Endoscope for Patients with Periodontitis: a Split-Mouth Controlled Study].

Comparative evaluation of the effect of impregnated retraction cord versus laser on gingival attachment level and pain perception following retraction for subgingival margins - A prospective, split-mouth, controlled, clinical study

Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions with Concentrated Growth Factor Membrane and Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique Via Digital Measurements: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

[Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis]

Effect of partial restorative treatment on stress distributions in non-carious cervical lesions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

[Effect of gingival biotype on total crown repair and gingival crevicular fluid inflammatory factors]

Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study of 2 procedures

[Clinical Evaluation of a Two-Step Etch-and-rinse Adhesive and a One-Step Self-Etch Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesion].