Abstract:Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common chronic progressive disease resulting in urinary obstruction in aging men. It comes to more and more patients with massive BPH with the aging of society and extension of life expectancy. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy, safety, and complications between transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of massive BPH. Design and setting: Patients with BPH were divided into the PKEP group and the TURP group randomly. Intraoperative blood loss (BL), operation time (OT), resected tissue weight (RTW), gland resection ratio (GRR), postoperative indwelling ureter time (IUT), bladder fistula time (BFT) and hospital stay time (HST), preoperative and postoperative serum sodium concentration (SSC), hemoglobin concentration (HGB), prostate weight (PW), postvoid residual (PVR), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and other complications were analyzed and compared respectively. Results: There was no statistical difference in preoperative IPSS, preoperative QOL score, preoperative PVR, preoperative Qmax, postoperative QOL score, postoperative PVR, postoperative Qmax, IPSS difference value (DV), Qmax DV, and PVR DV between the PKEP group and the TURP group (p > 0.05). OT, BL, IUT, BFT, HST, and postoperative IPSS in the PKEP group were significantly lower than that in the TURP group (p < 0.01). RTW and GRR in the PKEP group were significantly higher than that in the TURP group (p < 0.01). QOL DV in the PKEP group was higher than that in the TURP group (p < 0.05). There was statistical difference in SSC DV between the PKEP group and the TURP group (p < 0.05). There was significant statistical difference in postoperative PW, postoperative HGB, PW DV, and HGB DV between the PKEP group and the TURP group (p < 0.01). There was significant statistical difference in IPSS, QOL, PVR, and Qmax between postoperative value and preoperative value in both groups (p < 0.01). The incidence of transurethral resection syndrome, obturator nerve reflex, transient urinary incontinence, and retrograde ejaculation between the PKEP group and the TURP group has no statistical difference (p > 0.05). Capsule perforation, blood transfusion, secondary hemorrhage, bladder neck contracture, and urethral stricture in the PKEP group were lower than that in the TURP group (p < 0.05). Bladder spasm in the PKEP group was significantly lower than that in the TURP group (p < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in preoperative and postoperative IIEF-5, effective erectile frequency, telotism average tension, sustainable telotism average time, and sexual dissatisfaction between the PKEP group and the TURP group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: PKEP and TURP have similar clinical efficacy in the treatment of massive BPH. PKEP has advantages in shorter OT, less BL, more GRR, and fewer complications, but the long-term therapeutic effect of PKEP needs further follow-up.

Clinical effect of bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral enucleation in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

The value of transurethral cylindrical dilatation of the prostate in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral Enucleation of Prostate with Button Electrode Plasmakinetic Vaporization for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in high-risk and senior patients in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Transurethral Prostatectomy with the Bipolar Plasmakinetic Technique for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate and Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Massive Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (>80 ml)

PKEK and PKRP treatment for high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia via urethra

Comparison of efficacy and safety between transurethral enucleation and resection of prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia by plasma kinetics

Clinical observation of bipolar plasmakinetic combined with green laser in treatment of larger volume benign prostate hyperplasia

Transurethral Resection of Prostate with Bipolar Plasmakinetic for the Treatment of High Risk Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

The comparative analysis for the efficacy of the therapeutic effect of Plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate and Plasma kinetic resection of the prostate

Transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate combined with partitioned resection using Nesbit technique in treating BPH with huge volume

Comparative Analysis of Three Surgical Instruments in the Treatment of High Critical Enucleation of Prostate

[Transurethral Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia].

[Shovel-Shaped Electrode Transurethral Plasmakinetic Enucleation Versus Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia].

Efficacy and Safety of Bipolar Plasma Vaporization of the Prostate with "Button-Type" Electrode Compared with Transurethral Resection of Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate versus Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Massive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

The Effectiveness And Safety Of Transurethral (Bipolar) Plasmakinetic Resection Of Prostate Combined With Thulium Laser For Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (> 80ml)

Feasibility and safety of bipolar-plasmakinetic transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate in day surgery mode

Bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy in treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia