Mahavõ¯ra's geometrical problems: traces of unknown links between Jaina and Mediterranean mathematics in the classical ages

Jens Høyrup
2004-01-01
Abstract:In various publications (Høyrup 1995; 1996; 2001) I have argued for the existence in (what Western Europe sees as) the Near East of a long-lived community of practical geometers - first of all surveyors - which was not or only marginally linked to the scribe school traditions, and which (with branchings) carried a stock of methods and problems from the late third millennium BCE at least into the early second millennium CE. The arguments for this conclusion constitute an intricate web, and I shall only repeat those of them which are of immediate importance for my present concern: the links between the geometrical section of Mahavõ¯ra's Ganita-sara-saú ngraha and the practical mathematics of the Mediterra- nean region in the classical ages. Many of the mathematical methods of pre-Modern practical geometry are too generic to allow us to discriminate diffusion from independent creation - once area measures are based on length measures, for instance, there is only one reasonable way to determine the areas of rectangles, right triangles and right trapezia. Some formulae, it is true, are so complex and/or allow so many variations that agreement in detail appears to make accidental coincidence implausible, in particular if identical patterns turn up repeatedly in the same textual setting. The best evidence for transmission, however, is constituted by those mathematical riddles (often known as "recreational problems") that pre- Modern communities of mathematical practitioners used to define themselves cognitively and to demonstrate the professional valour of the members. Communities which in pre-Modern times were linked only marginally or
What problem does this paper attempt to address?