A Plea for the Mathematician
J. J. SYLVESTER
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/001261a0
IF: 64.8
1870-01-01
Nature
Abstract:II.I MIGHT go on, were it necessary, piling instance upon instance to prove the paramount importance of the faculty of observation to the process of mathematical discovery.* Were it not unbecoming to dilate on one's personal experience, I could tell a story of almost romantic interest about my own latest researches in a field where Geometry, Algebra, and the Theory of Numbers melt in a surprising manner into one another, like sunset tints or the colours of the dying dolphin, “the last still loveliest” (a sketch of which has just appeared in the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society),† which would very strikingly illustrate how much observation, divination, induction, experimental trial, and verification—causation, too (if that means, as, if it mean anything, I suppose it must, mounting from phenomena to their reasons or causes of being)—have to do with the work of the mathematician. In the face of these facts, which every analyst can vouch for out of his own knowledge and personal experience, how can it be maintained, in the words of Professor Huxley (who, in this instance, is speaking of the sciences as they are in themselves and without any reference to scholastic discipline), that Mathematics “ is that study which knows nothing of observation, nothing of induction, nothing of experiment, nothing of causation”?‡
multidisciplinary sciences