Abstract:In the theory of four—element crime constitution,there is no room for the objective punishment condition.But the objective punishable condition already exists in the criminal legislation of our country now.How to understand and apply these provisions is an issue that cannot be avoided in theory. The general view in the foreign countries is that the objective punishable conditions do not require the actor's cognition and foresight.However,regarding the objective punishable condition in general is suspected of oversimplifying the problem.According to substantial connection between some certain condition and illegality,the objective punishable condition can be divided into the internal and external condition two types,if we insist on the hierarchical constituents of crime theory .The most worthy of discussing is the internal objective punishable condition.It is in the "extended line" of behavior which increases the risk of infringing the interest in law when intervening factors appear.Although it is different from typical illegal element,it can produce illegal effect. Actor just needs to know the possibility of internal objective punishment condition.To the contrary, external objective punishment condition belongs to the category of criminal punishment,has no effect on the illegality and responsibility,and does not require the cognition and foresight of actors. The research of internal objective punishment condition is of great significance to understand and apply some provisions in our criminal legislation.There is necessity for the internal objective punishment condition to exist in the present stage.To put it further,recognizing this concept is in consideration of the doctrines of legally prescribed punishment for special crime and legal interest protection.If we recognize this concept,there is no need to advocate the concept of "objective surpassing elements".The problems regarded under the name of objective surpassing elements can be analyzed according to the approach of internal objective punishment conditions.

Reconsideration of Penalization for a Preparation from the Angle of the Criminal Norms Science

The Pretrial Agreement System of American Corporate Crime in the Perspective of Constitutionalism:Reviewing the Stein Case

The Dilemma and Breakthrough of General Principle of Punishing Preparatory Crime

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

On the Sentencing Discretion of Punishment Aimed at Prevention

Reflections from Normative Science Views on Crime Generalization and Penalty Aggravation in Narcotic Laws

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

The Perfection of Non-penalty Rectification System about Minor Crime in our Country

Research on Non-punishment Sanction and Its Judicial Application Theory

Re-thinking of Principle of No Punishment in Doubtful Cases

Consequence and Discretionary Action of Sentencing ——the Prohibition of Consequential Responsibility, Double Evaluation and Indirect Punishment

Deconstruct the Theory of Starting Point of a Crime and Reconstruct the Starting Point of a Punishable Act

Internal Objective Punishment Condition

On the Criminal Responsibility of Recommitments and Drug Recommitments

The Criminal Policy under the Circumstance of the Contemporary Rule of Law

On Criminal Penalty Restriction in Internet Public Opinion Supervising

Rethinking the Procedural Sanction Theory:Focusing on the Exclusionary Rule

The Theory of Conduct without Value and Positive General Prevention

Some Issues on the "Objective Punishment Condition"

Studies on Public Security Penalties: a Comparison Between Germany, Taiwan and Mainland China

A Criminal Policy Analysis on Criminal Norms