Abstract:As a schematic model of the complexity economic agents are confronted with, we introduce the "Sherrington-Kirkpatrick game," a discrete time binary choice model inspired from mean-field spin glasses. We show that, even in a completely static environment, agents are unable to learn collectively optimal strategies. This is either because the learning process gets trapped in a suboptimal fixed point or because learning never converges and leads to a never-ending evolution of agent intentions. Contrarily to the hope that learning might save the standard "rational expectation" framework in economics, we argue that complex situations are generically unlearnable and agents must do with satisficing solutions, as argued long ago by Simon [ Q. J. Econ. 69 , 99 (1955)]. Only a centralized, omniscient agent endowed with enormous computing power could qualify to determine the optimal strategy of all agents. Using a mix of analytical arguments and numerical simulations, we find that (i) long memory of past rewards is beneficial to learning, whereas overreaction to recent past is detrimental and leads to cycles or chaos; (ii) increased competition (nonreciprocity) destabilizes fixed points and leads first to chaos and, in the high competition limit, to quasicycles; (iii) some amount of randomness in the learning process, perhaps paradoxically, allows the system to reach better collective decisions; (iv) nonstationary, "aging" behavior spontaneously emerges in a large swath of parameter space of our complex but static world. On the positive side, we find that the learning process allows cooperative systems to coordinate around satisficing solutions with rather high (but markedly suboptimal) average reward. However, hypersensitivity to the game parameters makes it impossible to predict ex ante who will be better or worse off in our stylized economy. The statistical description of the space of satisficing solutions is an open problem. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021039 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Published by the American Physical Society

Learning under Limited Information

Learning Underspecified Models

Predicting Cooperation with Learning Models

Asynchronicity and Learning in Cost Sharing Mechanisms

Unlearnable Games and "Satisficing" Decisions: A Simple Model for a Complex World

Selfish learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Learning with incomplete information - and the mathematical structure behind it

Decentralized Online Learning in General-Sum Stackelberg Games

Learning in a complex world: Insights from an OLG lab experiment

Computing Optimal Equilibria and Mechanisms via Learning in Zero-Sum Extensive-Form Games

Inertial Coordination Games

Unlearnable Games and "Satisficing'' Decisions: A Simple Model for a Complex World

A Statistical View of Learning in the Centipede Game

Near-Optimal Learning of Extensive-Form Games with Imperfect Information

Convergence of Learning Dynamics in Information Retrieval Games

Strategic Teaching and Learning in Games

Adaptive Incentive Design with Learning Agents

Observational Learning with Competitive Prices

Information theoretic approach to interactive learning

Distributed Non-Bayesian Learning for Games with Incomplete Information

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games