Abstract:As a schematic model of the complexity economic agents are confronted with, we introduce the "Sherrington-Kirkpatrick game," a discrete time binary choice model inspired from mean-field spin glasses. We show that, even in a completely static environment, agents are unable to learn collectively optimal strategies. This is either because the learning process gets trapped in a suboptimal fixed point or because learning never converges and leads to a never-ending evolution of agent intentions. Contrarily to the hope that learning might save the standard "rational expectation" framework in economics, we argue that complex situations are generically unlearnable and agents must do with satisficing solutions, as argued long ago by Simon [ Q. J. Econ. 69 , 99 (1955)]. Only a centralized, omniscient agent endowed with enormous computing power could qualify to determine the optimal strategy of all agents. Using a mix of analytical arguments and numerical simulations, we find that (i) long memory of past rewards is beneficial to learning, whereas overreaction to recent past is detrimental and leads to cycles or chaos; (ii) increased competition (nonreciprocity) destabilizes fixed points and leads first to chaos and, in the high competition limit, to quasicycles; (iii) some amount of randomness in the learning process, perhaps paradoxically, allows the system to reach better collective decisions; (iv) nonstationary, "aging" behavior spontaneously emerges in a large swath of parameter space of our complex but static world. On the positive side, we find that the learning process allows cooperative systems to coordinate around satisficing solutions with rather high (but markedly suboptimal) average reward. However, hypersensitivity to the game parameters makes it impossible to predict ex ante who will be better or worse off in our stylized economy. The statistical description of the space of satisficing solutions is an open problem. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021039 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Published by the American Physical Society

A Statistical View of Learning in the Centipede Game

Rationalizing Irrational Beliefs

Learning Equilibria of Simulation-Based Games

Is Learning in Games Good for the Learners?

Endogenous Barriers to Learning

Learning not to Regret

Uncoupled Learning Rules for Seeking Equilibria in Repeated Plays: An Overview

Improving Quantal Cognitive Hierarchy Model Through Iterative Population Learning

Strategic Teaching and Learning in Games

Student of Games: A unified learning algorithm for both perfect and imperfect information games

Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneous-move games

Learning to Play Two-Player Perfect-Information Games without Knowledge

Cycles of cooperation and defection in imperfect learning

On the robustness of learning in games with stochastically perturbed payoff observations

Learning Probably Approximately Correct Maximin Strategies in Simulation-Based Games with Infinite Strategy Spaces

Distributed Non-Bayesian Learning for Games with Incomplete Information

Anticipatory Learning in Two-Person Games: Some Experimental Results

The equivalence of dynamic and strategic stability under regularized learning in games

Regret Pruning for Learning Equilibria in Simulation-Based Games

Unlearnable Games and "Satisficing" Decisions: A Simple Model for a Complex World

Learning Decision Criteria from Play