Knowledge and Criminal Presumption

Zhou Guang-quan
2009-01-01
Abstract:Usually,judicial presumption of is preconditioned by the fact that the actor is competent of having such rather than his having no competence.As for subjective cognition,it is polarized into definite knowledge(surely know)and definitely not know, and in between one can further find actually know, would-know and should-know, most of which,however,have nothing to do with presumption.In the judicial interpretation,the term should know is frequently used,but in most cases it really means actually know that nearly does not fall within the ambit of criminal presumption.Thus,it is necessary to use definite knowledge or actually know to address in judicial interpretation.Only in cases where presumption is clearly needed,should we use should know. Division of and specification of its connotation is of great significance for its contribution to full consideration of burden of proof in criminal cases and conduciveness to accurate judicial interpretation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?