Abstract:Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is an essential component of legal assistant systems, which aims to automatically predict judgment results from a given criminal fact description. As a vital subtask of LJP, researchers have paid little attention to the numerical LJP, i.e., the prediction of imprisonment and penalty. Existing methods ignore numerical information in the criminal facts, making their performances far from satisfactory. For instance, the amount of theft varies, as do the prison terms and penalties. The major challenge is how the model can obtain the ability of numerical comparison and magnitude perception, e.g., 400 < 500 < 800, 500 is closer to 400 than to 800. To this end, we propose a judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning architecture, called NumLJP, for the numerical LJP task. Specifically, we first implement a contrastive learning-based judicial knowledge selector to distinguish confusing criminal cases efficiently. Unlike previous approaches that employ the law article as external knowledge, judicial knowledge is a quantitative guideline in real scenarios. It contains many numerals (called anchors) that can construct a reference frame. Then we design a masked numeral prediction task to help the model remember these anchors to acquire legal numerical commonsense from the selected judicial knowledge. We construct a scale-based numerical graph using the anchors and numerals in facts to perform magnitude-aware numerical reasoning. Finally, the representations of fact description, judicial knowledge, and numerals are fused to make decisions. We conduct extensive experiments on three real-world datasets and select several competitive baselines. The results demonstrate that the macro-F1 of NumLJP improves by at least 9.53% and 11.57% on the prediction of penalty and imprisonment, respectively.

Knowledge Management In Court Adjudication

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

Legal knowledge management for prosecutors based on judgment prediction and error analysis from indictments

Knowledge is Power: Understanding Causality Makes Legal judgment Prediction Models More Generalizable and Robust

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases

Model of knowledge management integrating context

Knowledge Management

Knowledge-Enriched Multi-Cross Attention Network for Legal Judgment Prediction

AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation

A Corpus-Based Interpretation of the Discourse–cognitive–society Triangle on Chinese Court Judgments

Knowledge Representation for the Intelligent Legal Case Retrieval

On Constructing a Knowledge Base of Chinese Criminal Cases

A Knowledge Representation Model for the Intelligent Retrieval of Legal Cases

Leverage Knowledge Graph and Large Language Model for Law Article Recommendation: A Case Study of Chinese Criminal Law

Construction of Knowledge Graph of Judicial Case Based on LLMs and Embedding Models

Judgment Prediction Based on Case Life Cycle

Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction for Judicial Cases

Judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning for numerical legal judgment prediction

Low-Resource Court Judgment Summarization for Common Law Systems

CPEE: Civil Case Judgment Prediction centering on the Trial Mode of Essential Elements