Abstract:Massive legal documents have promoted the application of legal intelligence. Among them, Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) has emerged as a critical task, garnering significant attention. LJP aims to predict judgment results for multiple subtasks, including charges, law articles, and terms of penalty. Existing studies primarily focus on utilizing the entire factual description to produce judgment results, overlooking the practical judicial scenario where judges consider various crime circumstances to decide verdicts and sentencing. To this end, in this article, we propose a circumstance-aware LJP framework (i.e., NeurJudge) by exploring the circumstances of crime. Specifically, NeurJudge first separates the factual description into different circumstances with the predicted results of intermediate subtasks and then employs them to yield results of other subtasks. Besides, as confusing verdicts may degrade the performance of LJP, we further develop a variant of NeurJudge (NeurJudge+) that incorporates the semantics of labels (charges and law articles) into facts to yield more expressive and distinguishable fact representations. Finally, to provide explanations for LJP, we extend NeurJudge to an explainable LJP framework E-NeurJudge with a cooperative teacher-student system. The teacher system is NeurJudge which exploits legal particularities well but lacks explanation capability. The student system is a rationalization method that provides explainability but fails to utilize legal particularities. To combine the advantages of the above methods, we use a transferring function to transfer legal particularities from the teacher to the student, making a trade-off between yielding LJP results and rendering them explainable. Extensive experimental results on real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of our proposed frameworks.

CPEE: Civil Case Judgment Prediction centering on the Trial Mode of Essential Elements

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage Case Representation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage CaseRepresentation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Topology-aware Multi-task Learning Framework for Civil Case Judgment Prediction

Judgment Prediction Based on Case Life Cycle

FCA-LJP: A Method Based on Formal Concept Analysis for Case Judgment Prediction

Legal Judgment Prediction Based on Computer Topology Learning and Fact Elements

Knowledge-Enriched Multi-Cross Attention Network for Legal Judgment Prediction

ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation

A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges

Research on a Decision Prediction Method Based on Causal Inference and a Multi-Expert FTOPJUDGE Mechanism

Legal Judgment Prediction via Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Network

Automatic Judgment Prediction via Legal Reading Comprehension

NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction.

Knowledge is Power: Understanding Causality Makes Legal judgment Prediction Models More Generalizable and Robust

Legal judgment prediction via optimized multi-task learning fusing similarity correlation

A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction

Contrastive Learning for Legal Judgment Prediction

Judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning for numerical legal judgment prediction