Abstract:Multiple defendants in a criminal fact description generally exhibit complex interactions, and cannot be well handled by existing Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) methods which focus on predicting judgment results (e.g., law articles, charges, and terms of penalty) for single-defendant cases. To address this problem, we propose the task of multi-defendant LJP, which aims to automatically predict the judgment results for each defendant of multi-defendant cases. Two challenges arise with the task of multi-defendant LJP: (1) indistinguishable judgment results among various defendants; and (2) the lack of a real-world dataset for training and evaluation. To tackle the first challenge, we formalize the multi-defendant judgment process as hierarchical reasoning chains and introduce a multi-defendant LJP method, named Hierarchical Reasoning Network (HRN), which follows the hierarchical reasoning chains to determine criminal relationships, sentencing circumstances, law articles, charges, and terms of penalty for each defendant. To tackle the second challenge, we collect a real-world multi-defendant LJP dataset, namely MultiLJP, to accelerate the relevant research in the future. Extensive experiments on MultiLJP verify the effectiveness of our proposed HRN.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is that in the description of criminal cases with multiple defendants, the existing Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) methods mainly focus on single - defendant cases and cannot handle the complex interactions among multiple defendants well, resulting in difficulty in accurately predicting the judgment results of each defendant. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to automatically predict the judgment results of each defendant in multi - defendant cases, including applicable legal provisions, charges and sentences, etc. The paper points out that the multi - defendant LJP task faces two main challenges: 1. **Indistinguishable judgment results among different defendants**: Since multiple defendants are usually mixed together in the case description, it makes it difficult to distinguish the judgment results of different defendants, thus affecting the ability to make accurate judgments for each defendant. 2. **Lack of real - world multi - defendant LJP datasets**: The existing LJP datasets are either only annotated for single - defendant cases or only annotated for a certain subtask in multi - defendant cases, lacking datasets that comprehensively cover multi - defendant cases. To address these challenges, the paper proposes the following solutions: - **Formalize the multi - defendant judgment process into a hierarchical reasoning chain**: By introducing a Hierarchical Reasoning Network (HRN) to simulate the logical reasoning process of judges and distinguish the judgment results of different defendants. HRN achieves this goal through a two - layer reasoning chain: the first - layer reasoning chain identifies the relationships among defendants and determines the sentencing circumstances of each defendant; the second - layer reasoning chain predicts and verifies the legal provisions, charges and sentences of each defendant. - **Construct a real - world dataset**: Collected a real - world multi - defendant LJP dataset named MultiLJP, which contains 23,717 multi - defendant cases. The legal provisions, charges, sentences, criminal relationships and sentencing circumstances of each defendant are manually annotated by professional annotators. Through these methods, the paper aims to improve the accuracy and robustness of the multi - defendant LJP task and provide a benchmark dataset for future research. The experimental results show that HRN is significantly superior to the baseline methods in various subtasks of the multi - defendant LJP task, especially when using the real - annotated criminal relationships and sentencing circumstances, the performance improvement is more obvious.

Multi-Defendant Legal Judgment Prediction via Hierarchical Reasoning

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage Case Representation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage CaseRepresentation Learning in the Real Court Setting

HD-LJP: A Hierarchical Dependency-based Legal Judgment Prediction Framework for multi-task learning

Legal Judgment Prediction Via Topological Learning

Legal Judgment Prediction via Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Network

ML-LJP: Multi-Law Aware Legal Judgment Prediction

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases

Legal judgment prediction via optimized multi-task learning fusing similarity correlation

Legal Judgment Prediction via Heterogeneous Graphs and Knowledge of Law Articles

Research on a Decision Prediction Method Based on Causal Inference and a Multi-Expert FTOPJUDGE Mechanism

LegalReasoner: A Multi-Stage Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction via Large Language Models and Knowledge Integration

Gated hierarchical multi-task learning network for judicial decision prediction

LegalDuet: Learning Effective Representations for Legal Judgment Prediction through a Dual-View Legal Clue Reasoning

Judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning for numerical legal judgment prediction

Distinguish Confusion in Legal Judgment Prediction via Revised Relation Knowledge

A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction

Legal Judgment Prediction via graph boosting with constraints

NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction.

Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction