Taking Criminal Presumptions Seriously

Lao Dongyan
2007-01-01
Abstract:The empirical analysis of 44 criminal presumptions in our criminal law indicates that they relax the proving requirement to the prosecution and shift the risk of doubt to defendants,deviating from the proof standard of beyond a reasonable doubt and directly threatening the values and interests protected by the principle of presumption of innocence.The proof standard of beyond a reasonable doubt should not be explained from a pure procedural perspective.It is necessary to connect it with the state power of crimi- nal sanction in the substantial sense.The regulation of the criminal presumptions is essentially a restric- tion to the state power of criminal sanction.Only when all the related substantial and procedural stan- dards are satisfied,can the criminal presumption in favor of the prosecution be applied.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?