A Comparative Study Between MR Myocardial Perfusion Imaging,ct Coronary Angiography and Selective Coronary Angiography

吴梅,梁志伟,邝锦锋,江新青,古杰洪,林竹

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2010.02.004

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate efficacy of MR myocardial perfusion imaging(MRMPI) and CT coronary angiography(CTCA) in detecting coronary artery disease(CAD).Methods 30 patients with CAD confirmed by selective coronary angiography(SCA) were enrolled.All patients underwent routine static and ATP-stress MRI to perform myocardial perfusion imaging in first-pass and delayed phase.All patients underwent CTCA.The results were compared with those obtained from SCA.Parameters as sensitivity,specificity and kappa value were calculated.Results 50%-70% stenosis was seen in 23 branches of the coronary artery,first-pass imaging found stenosis and poor perfusion in 18 branches(78.26%);70%-90% stenosis in 17 branches,poor perfusion in 15(88.24%),delayed enhancement in 8 branches; 90% stenosis in 5 branches,poor perfusion and delayed enhancement in 5 branches(100%).6(46.15%)was transmural,7(53.85%)was nontransmural.By referring to coronary angiography,sensitivity and specificity for detecting stenosis more than 50% by first-pass imaging and CTCA were 84.44% 、91.11% and 90.48%、 97.09% respectively.The kappa value between MRMPI,CTCA and SCA were 0.76 and 0.88 respectively.Conclusion High consistency of the results was found between MRMPI、CTCA and SCA.They have high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing CAD.MRMPI is effective in detecting blood flow of myocardium and CTCA can judge degree of stenosis accurately.They can supply valuable information and guidance for the diagnosis and treatment for the patients.