A Comparison Of99mtc-Mibi Myocardial SPET with Electron Beam Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease

Zhiming Yao,Xiu Jie Liu,Rongfang Shi,Ruping Dai,Shaoxiong Zhang,Yunzhong Liu,Shengting Li,Yueqin Tian,Xiaoli Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01254242
IF: 10.057
1997-01-01
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Abstract:We compared technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) myocardial perfusion single-photon emission tomography (SPET) (MPS) and electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) in order to assess their respective value in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD).99mTc-MIBI SPET (stress-resting) and EBCT studies were performed in 51 patients with suspected CAD who underwent coronary angiography (CAG). CAG showed that of the 51 patients, 36 had coronary stenosis ≥50% while 15 had normal results. A moderate positive rank correlation was found between coronary calcification detected by EBCT and MPS score (rs=0.5283,P<0.01). The concordance between EBCT and MPS for the evaluation of CAD was 72.5% (37/51). The sensitivity of EBCT in detecting CAD in 51 patients was comparable to that of MPS (81% vs 94%, NS). However, the accuracy of EBCT was lower than that of MPS (78% vs 94%,P<0.025). As regards the detection of individual coronary artery disease, there was no significant difference in sensitivity between EBCT and MPS (65% vs 75%, NS); however, the specificity and accuracy of EBCT were lower than those of MPS (specificity: 77% vs 95%,P<0.005; accuracy 71% vs 85%,P<0.005). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MPS in detecting single-vessel disease were higher than those of EBCT (sensitivity: 86% vs 42%,P<0.025; specificity: 96% vs 70%,P<0.025; accuracy: 93% vs 61%,P<0.005). However, no significant differences in the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MPS and EBCT were found in respect of multivessel disease. In conclusion:99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion SPET and EBCT provide different information in the assessment of CAD. The sensitivity of EBCT for the detection of CAD is comparable with that of MPS; however, the specificity and accuracy of EBCT are lower than those of MPS. More reliable results will be obtained if both myocardial perfusion SPET and EBCT are performed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?