Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Application of MRI diffusion weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of 42 cases of renal malignant and benign tumors

Application of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis

The Application of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Cervical Lymph Node Lesions

Application of 3.0T-MRI DWI in evaluating the efficacy of synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differential Diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

The Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Malignant Renal Tumors

Application of MRI Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Application of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Differential Diagnosis of Soft-Tissue Tumors

Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Clinical application of diffusion-weighted MRI in uterine tumors-evaluation of signal intensity and ADC values

Application of DWI in the differential diagnosis of brain glioma and brain metastases

The differential diagnosis of malignant and benign bladder neoplasm using diffusion-weighted MR imaging

Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of renal lesions.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Abdominal Oncology

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Human Renal Lesions (benignity or Malignancy): a Meta-Analysis.

Recent Progress of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessment of Tumor in the Body

The Value of MR-DWI in Differential Diagnosis of Non-Lactating Inflammatory Breast Diseases and Non-Mass Enhanced Breast Cancer

Clinical Applications of Diffusion‐weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions – a Systematic Review

Value of MRI in-phase and opposed-phase,apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion-weighted imaging in distinguishing benign and malignant spinal lesions