Abstract:Objective·To compare the stress distribution at abutments, edentulous ridge, and peri-implant tissue under the vertical load between the RPI-type removable partial denture supported by implants with different diameter and the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture using a three-dimensional photoelastic method. Methods·The mandibular Kennedy I type denture defect models were fabricated according to the standard mandibular model. Four Straumann system soft tissue level implants with different diameters (two 4.1 mm implants and two 3.3 mm implants) were implanted into the bilateral first molar areas. Planting nails and epoxy resin teeth were inversely put into the mandibular silicone rubber molds to fabricate the epoxy resin photoelastic models and the regular neck (RN) healing abutments were screwed into the implants. A simulated alveolar mucosa with thickness of 2mm and a conventional RPI-type removable partial denture were placed on the epoxy resin models with or without implants. Then a force of 1 kg was vertically applied by a bite force loading device which fixed the model and denture in the centric occlusion. After the stress was frozen, model slices at different areas were cut and the stress fringes were observed. The stress was calculated according to the fringe value of per unit thickness. Results·For the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture, the maximum stress of distal abutment was mainly concentrated on the apical regions and the maximum stress of edentulous ridge was concentrated on the first molar area, particular on the lingual side of alveolar bone. For the implant-supported RPI-type removable partial denture, the maximum stress of distal abutment was lower than that of the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture, and the maximum stress of edentulous ridge (without the implants) was similar to that of abutment and supporting tissues and was lower than that of the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture. The stress around the implant was the largest and the peri-apical stress of implant was greater than the neck stress of implant. Meanwhile, the maximum stress around the implant was increased with the decrease of implant diameter. Conclusion·Compared to the conventional RPI-type removable partial denture, removable partial dentures supported by implants are more stable with a more balanced stress distribution in supporting tissues, thus benefit the health of abutments and supporting tissues.

[Stress Analyses and Comparison of the Kennedy III Dentition Defect Restored with Removable Partial Denture].

Stress analysis of the supporting tissues for mandibular Kennedy ClassⅠ defect repaired with removable partial dentures supported by implants

Stress distribution in the supporting tissue with oblique forces on extracoronal attachment denture to mandibular Kennedy Ⅰ dentition defect

3D Finite element analysis of bilateral distal-extension extracoronal attachment denture with different abutment periodontal quantity

Influence of Various Abutment Number on Stress Distribution in the Attachment Denture Supporting Tissue

Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution about Abutments Periodontal Membranes of Separated Removable Partial Denture and Conical Telescope

Study on Biomechanics of Kennedy Class Ⅱ Removable Partial Denture with Polyacetal Resin

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of removable partial denture with periodontally compromised abutments

Study of the stress distribution on the supporting tissues of removable partial dentures with different retainer

Influence of abutment periodontal quantity on stress distribution in supporting tissue on extracoronal attachment denture with unilateral distal-extension prosthesis

Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Three Removable Partial Dentures under Different Loading Conditions

Stress Analysis of Precision Attachment Dentures for Mandibular Distal-Extension Edentulous Cases

Stress Analysis for Different Designs of Implant-borne and Tooth-implant Fixed Partial Dentures in Mandibular Posterior Region

Comparison of Stress Distribution on Telescopic Denture and Clasp-Retention Denture for Bilateral Free-Ended Cases

Analysis of Stress and Displacement in Distal-extension Removable Partial Dentures with Mesial and Distal Occlusal Rest.

[The 3D Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distributions in Abutment and Periodontal Tissues with Extra-Coronal Attachment].

Stress Analysis of Distal-Extension Removable Partial Dentures Supported by Mini Implants

3-D FEA of the stress state of abutment and its periodontal tissue with three different retention styles in the absence of mandibular anterior teeth]

Stress analysis of distal-extension prosthetics with mesial and distal occlusal rest

Stress Distribution of Fixed Partial Denture Affected by Abutments with Absorbed Alveoli

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-assisted removable partial dentures