Can Sanctions Stop Proliferation?

Dingli Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/wash.2008.31.3.89

2008-01-01

Abstract:How effective have sanctions been, and what do the North Korea and Iran cases say about China's evolving attitudes toward sanctions as a nonproliferation tool?.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Sanctions for Nuclear Inhibition: Comparing Sanction Conditions between Iran and North Korea

Inwook Kim,Jung-Chul Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2019.0003

2019-01-01

Asian Perspective

Abstract:When do sanctions succeed in nuclear inhibition? Is there a generalizable framework to estimate sanction effectiveness against nuclear aspirants? Instead of relying on partial equilibrium analysis, we conceptualize sanctions as three sequential phases—imposition of economic pain, conversation to political pressure, and creation (or failure thereof) of zone of possible agreement (ZOPA). The effectiveness of each phase is subject to phase-specific contextual variables, an aggregation of which helps measure individual sanction's effectiveness, conduct cross-case comparison, and estimate one's replicability in other cases. To illustrate its analytical utility, we analyze the divergent sanction outcomes between Iran in 2012–2015 and North Korea in 2013–2017. Iran was economically more vulnerable and politically less resilient, and its bargaining position was closer to a ZOPA than North Korea was. Our analysis questions the utility of economic sanctions against North Korea and helps expand the discussion away from the policy obsession with the role of China. Theoretically, it rectifies an imbalance against qualitative and holistic approach in the sanction literature and contributes to discussions about nuclear inhibition strategies.

international relations
Nuclear Proliferation and International Security Case Studies of Iran and North Korea

Waheed Jan,Muhammad Fahim Khan,Naila Farooq

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2024(ix-iii).02

2024-09-30

Global Strategic & Securities Studies Review

Abstract:The widespread existence of weapons presents a threat, to global security as evidenced by the circumstances involving Iran and North Korea. Both countries pursued nuclear policies, leading to regional and global conflict. Rightly needing peace, Iran’s nuclear energy has faced international skepticism, resulting in sanctions and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action to Control its Nuclear Activities (JCPOA) but the effectiveness of "the JCPOA remains controversial", worrying Iran to comply according to the law. In contrast, North Korea's nuclear program is growing more military, with many tests of nuclear weapons and missile launches in defiance of UN resolutions. Despite international attempts, including treaties and penalties, North Korea's nuclear development continues to deteriorate, defying global non-proliferation rules. Global security requires better international collaboration, robust verification methods, and long-term transnational solutions.
Research on U.S. Economic Sanctions on North Korea and the lifting process: Focusing on the lifting of Vietnam and Iran

Hyung Sub Lim,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31999/sonkl.2023.30.9

2023-12-31

Unification and North Korean Law Studies

Abstract:U.S.sanctions are based on U.S. foreign policy concerns about international terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction(WMD), national security, and communism. U.S. sanctions against North Korea began in earnest after North Korea's first nuclear test in 2006 and its fourth nuclear test and long-range missile launch in 2016. The U.S. has imposed sanctions on North Korea under the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) and the International Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), which are comprehensive sanctions measures. The U.S. has imposed sanctions on North Korea since the Korean War in 1950, and since 2016, the U.S. sanctions program has constituted the most powerful all-round pressure tool in the history of the U.S. sanctions program. U.S. sanctions are binding because they are centered on the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which can impose substantial sanctions on violators through “secondary sanctions”. However, given that there have been cases where U.S. sanctions have been relaxed or completely lifted due to changes in U.S. policy or negotiations with sanctioned countries or normalization of relations, it is possible to predict that U.S. unilateral sanctions on North Korea could also be relaxed or lifted. Through a detailed analysis of the cases of Vietnam and Iran, which are representative of the successes and failures of the U.S. in easing and lifting unilateral sanctions, we analyze the implications and prospects of easing and lifting U.S. unilateral sanctions on North Korea according to the trend of denuclearization negotiations between North Korea and the United States. The fact that the U.S. has pursued comprehensive agreements and phased sanctions relief in its sanctions relief and lifting process; that it has not lifted economic sanctions until the diplomatic objectives it sought to achieve through economic sanctions were met, even if it took a long time; and that it has reimposed sanctions even after reaching agreements through comprehensive agreements, utilizing snapback provisions if the sanctioned country did not implement the agreement in good faith and did not meet U.S. political and diplomatic interests have important implications for the sanctions relief and lifting process. It is important to note that even if the U.S. eventually reaches a comprehensive agreement through denuclearization negotiations with North Korea, sanctions relief could be delayed for a significant period of time or reimposed if North Korea fails to properly implement its nuclear disabling measures. In addition, it is important to monitor the progress of the U.S. sanctions removal process and the North Korea-U.S. denuclearization negotiations and prepare an action plan for each scenario in advance for inter-Korean exchange and cooperation projects and North Korea policy.
Strategizing in a turbulent world: Analyzing the effects of international sanctions and policy shifts on corporate innovation

Feifan Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105765

IF: 9.848

2024-08-09

Finance Research Letters

Abstract:This study examines the impact of international sanctions and policy shifts on the technological innovation of non-financial publicly listed companies in China from 2007 to 2022. It articulates the theoretical mechanisms through which international sanctions affect corporate technological innovation, considering aspects of international trade and capital flows. The findings indicate that international sanctions significantly inhibit corporate innovation, whereas policy shifts substantially foster it. Moreover, international sanctions can restrict corporate innovation through limitations on international trade and capital flows. Based on these findings, the study proposes relevant recommendations.

business, finance
How Do International Conflicts Impact China’s Energy Security and Economic Growth? A Case Study of the US Economic Sanctions on Iran

Xiaoxiao Hu,Ling He,Qi Cui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126903

IF: 3.9

2021-06-18

Sustainability

Abstract:International conflicts cause global energy price fluctuations and supply disruptions, which can threaten energy security and economic growth in energy-importing countries, including China. However, the implications and impact mechanisms of international conflicts on the energy security and economy of oil-importing countries have been poorly explored. Using US economic sanctions on Iran as a case, a global energy-extended computable general equilibrium model, GTAP-E, is employed to assess the impacts of international conflicts on China’s energy production, trade and supply, sectoral outputs, and economic growth. The results indicate that the USA–Iran tension would threaten China’s energy security, mainly due to the instability of the energy supply and the consequent upsurge of energy prices. However, if increased oil exports from other Persian Gulf countries compensate for the global oil supply shortages, China’s energy supply would be generally assured. Moreover, because of the close energy cooperation links between Iran and China, the sanctions could decrease the Chinese outputs of non-energy sectors and economic growth. Nevertheless, compared with sole-sanction situations, the results from a possible USA–Iran tension escalation, going as far as Iran’s closure of the Hormuz Strait, could pose a more serious risk to China’s energy security and economic growth.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
The impact of U.S. economic sanctions on corporate innovation and fraud

Ameneh Bazrafshan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2077

IF: 1.854

2024-10-27

Public Administration and Development

Abstract:Economic sanctions have increasingly become a pivotal tool in modern foreign policy, especially in the context of U.S. international strategy. Despite their growing significance, there is a notable lack of empirical research on how these sanctions affect corporate behavior. This study aims to explore the impact of U.S. economic sanctions on innovation and fraudulent activities within Iranian firms subjected to these measures. Utilizing a difference‐in‐differences approach, the findings reveal a weak and negative relationship between sanctions and innovation, while no significant link is found between sanctions and fraudulent activities. Notably, the study uncovers a substantial divergence in companies' responses to sanctions based on their innovation background. Companies with a strong innovation background experience a significant increase in innovation efforts and a corresponding decline in fraudulent behavior upon facing sanctions. In contrast, companies lacking an established innovation background exhibit a reduction in innovation and, in turn, an escalation in fraudulent practices in response to sanctions. These findings remain robust across various sensitivity analyses. This research contributes to the expanding body of empirical literature on sanction outcomes by highlighting the profound impact of innovation background on the responsible and ethical decisions made by sanctioned companies.

public administration,development studies
Unleashing Innovation Under Sanctions: The Catalyst of National Culture

Anh Dang Bao Phan,Daniel Dao,Loan Thi Quynh Nguyen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3065

2024-11-13

International Journal of Finance & Economics

Abstract:This article explores how national culture moderates the impact of economic sanctions on a targeted country's innovation performance, using a dynamic difference‐in‐difference approach. Our empirical analysis utilises a panel dataset spanning 213 nations from 2013 to 2019. We discover that economic sanctions generally have a detrimental effect on the innovation performance of targeted countries. However, not all types of sanctions have the same negative impact on innovation. Specifically, financial, arms, and travel sanctions exhibit this negative influence. Furthermore, we reveal that under the sanction circumstances, countries characterised by high power distance and high uncertainty avoidance cultures tend to experience a higher level of innovation performance. Our findings remain robust after conducting various tests. In our subsequent analyses, we focus on different types of sanctions and find that the favourable impact of power distance and uncertainty avoidance culture on the relationship between sanctions and innovation applies primarily to financial sanctions.

business, finance
Cross-national sanctions and green innovation: Worldwide investigation

Qiang Fu,Chun-Ping Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2712

2024-06-30

Oeconomia Copernicana

Abstract:Research background: Cross-national sanctions are external factors with high uncertainty. The current situation of green innovation is not optimistic and the future of the uncertain development is worth exploring. Purpose of the article: This study intends to investigate how cross-national sanctions affect green innovations by examining data from 130 countries from 1990 to 2020. We use six different forms of sanctions (including those from the U.S., EU, UN, as well as unilateral, plurilateral, and economic sanctions) as the primary explanatory variables, with environmental management innovations serving as a proxy for green innovations. Methods: Difference-in-Difference (DID) technique; Logit model. Findings & value added: The number of environmental management inventions produced by a nation's inventors is negatively affected by plurilateral and economic sanctions, as well as by the US and the EU sanctions, while other types of sanctions have weaker effects. In terms of sub-indicators, plurilateral and the US sanctions have a serious negative impact on air pollution control and water pollution control inventions, while plurilateral, The EU and economic sanctions have a negative impact on waste management innovations. However, unilateral and the UN sanctions have no apparent effect on any type of environmental technology. Further logit model tests show that the US and economic sanctions lead to a decrease in green innovations. Moreover, the difference between Asian and African countries is that the negative effects of plurilateral, the U.S., the EU, and economic sanctions are more obvious in African countries, while cross-national sanctions have no significant impact on Asian countries. The results of our study should help countries under sanctions to respond more effectively to environmental progress.

economics
Economic sanctions against North Korea: The pivotal role of US–China cooperation

Woo-Jun Min,Sukhee Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865920901896

2020-03-19

International Area Studies Review

Abstract:At the beginning of 2018, North Korea halted its long-range nuclear- and ballistic-missile development programs and announced that it was willing to denuclearize. Soon afterwards, it reached out to countries including the US, China and South Korea. This sudden change in behavior marked the end of six years of extreme isolation under Kim Jong-un’s leadership. To explain why North Korea decided to reach out when it did, the present study examines the 2006–2018 economic sanctions levied on North Korea under the US maximum-pressure policy, carried out partly in cooperation with China. The findings suggest that economic sanctions were ineffective between 2006 and 2016 for two reasons: the lack of cooperation between the US and China, and China’s policy of assisting North Korea. In 2006–2016, China and North Korea had shared values and high volumes of trade; there were no clear signs of cooperation between the US and China. However, as trade between China and North Korea began to decrease in late 2017 and early 2018, there were signs of cooperation between the US and China, and changes in North Korean behavior. North Korea came to the negotiating table largely to lift the economic sanctions, which were strengthened by cooperation between the US and China. Increased economic pressure compelled North Korea to normalize its relations with the US, China and South Korea.
Who is afraid of sanctions? The macroeconomic and distributional effects of the sanctions against Iran

Morteza Ghomi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12203

2021-12-13

Economics and Politics

Abstract:The sanctions imposed on Iran at the beginning of 2012 have simultaneously limited the country's access to the international financial system, levied a strict boycott on Iran's oil and petrochemical exports, and limited imports of intermediate goods. This paper tries to quantify the aggregate and heterogeneous effects of these sanctions. Applying the synthetic control method, I show that the sanctions had persistent and significant effects on the Iranian economy. The cost reached its maximum of 19.1% of real gross domestic product 4 years after the application of the sanctions, and the economy has not fully recovered after their removal. I trace the poverty dynamics for different household groups after the sanctions by adopting a synthetic panel using Iran's household income and expenditure survey data. Inconsistently with the sanctions' initial goals, poverty dynamics suggest that households working in governmental sectors and educated households are unaffected by the sanctions. Instead, the sanctions condemn young, illiterate, rural, or religious minority households to poverty.

economics,political science
Cooperative Denuclearization toward North Korea

Dingli Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01636600903232251

2009-01-01

Abstract:Why has the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) been so defiant against the international community? What could be its external and internal motivations to carry out new missile tests, and...
The Effects Of International Sanctions On Green Innovations

Qiang Fu,Qiang Gong,Xin-Xin Zhao,Chun-Ping Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17782

2022-11-25

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

Abstract:Since China is facing a complicated international situation and sustainable development requirement at the same time, this paper examines the effects of external uncertainty, international sanctions, on green innovations by adopting the system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation for 30 provinces (autonomous region and municipalities) from 1997 to 2019. We employ green inventions as the dependent variable and 5 indicators of sanctions (including unilateral, plurilateral, multilateral, economic, and intensity) as the main explanatory variables alternately. For further robustness tests, we use substitution variable green utility models, adopt sub-samples in different regions, change the empirical methodology, and add omitted variables. We also examine the mechanism effects of three possible channels. The conclusion is that plurilateral and economic sanctions both present significant negative impacts on green innovations, whereas China was not affected by unilateral or multilateral sanctions during the sample period. GDP, interpersonal globalization, and environment are proved to be the possible channels through which sanctions affect green innovations. Our research findings should assist Chinese-listed companies suffering from sanctions to make better responses on their way to green innovations.

economics
The impact of international sanctions on environmental performance

Qiang Fu,Yin E Chen,Chyi-Lu Jang,Chun-Ping Chang,Yin E. Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141007

2020-11-01

Abstract:<p>This paper studies the impact of international sanctions on environmental performance by using the panel fixed effect model for 22 sanctioned states over the period 2002–2016 while considering several cases of international sanctions (unilateral, plurilateral, U.S., EU, UN, economic, and intensity) and measures environmental performance by the Environmental Performance Index (EPI). Overall, we find that the imposition of unilateral, plurilateral, U.S., EU, and economic sanctions has a significantly negative impact on EPI, dropping their EPI scores respectively by 0.114, 0.060, 0.045, 0.084, and 0.063, while a level increase of intensity results in EPI dropping by 0.028. Moreover, the simultaneous-equation models and Sobel tests show that the intermediate effect about GDP between international sanctions on environmental performance is significantly negative. We believe that our empirical findings can contribute to policy formulation by those sanctioned countries.</p>

environmental sciences
Circumventing Sanctions: The Impact of Sino-Iranian Relations On Iran Within The Middle-East Power Constellation (Case Study of Iran-Israel Proxy War in Syria)

Patricia Patricia,Kinanti Aristawidya,Marchelle Adriani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26593/sentris.v3i2.5120.118-141

2022-11-30

Jurnal Sentris

Abstract:Due to its hostile behavior in the Middle East, Iran has been sanctioned severely by the international community. Despite isolation attempts by the international community, Iran is nevertheless regarded as a powerhouse in the regional power constellation, owing to its actions in the Middle-Eastern proxy wars. Acknowledging the anomaly of Iran’s capabilities in spite of heavy sanctions, this research arguably shows how Sino-Iranian relations paves the way for Iran to circumvent sanctions. Subsequent to learning about China’s support for Iran, this research questions if the aforementioned support has an impact on Iran’s actions and status within the regional power constellation. Furthermore, this research also questions the influence of Iran and China’s relations towards the former’s ability in pursuing its aims through the Syrian proxy war against Israel in the account of international sanctions and condemnations. Guided by the concept of balancing by Stephen M. Walt and an exploitative model of proxy warfare theory, this research finds the Sino-Iranian relations as having a significant effect towards improving Tehran’s capabilities and acquisition of power in the Middle-East power constellation. Moreover, concerning the Iran-Israel proxy war, China’s actions are proven to mainly affect Iran and the Syrian civil war within the political sphere.
Assessing the Effectiveness of Security Assurances on the DPRK's Nuclear Issue

Yi Ding,Dingli Shen

2019-01-01

Abstract:In the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)'s case of nuclear proliferation, less attention has been paid to the role of security assurances. This paper seeks to assess the role of security assurances for the DPRK provided by the UN, the Soviet Union, China, and the United States and to figure out why these assurances are less effective to bridle its nuclear ambition. It argues that an effective security assurance for nuclear non-proliferation should meet at least two conditions. Firstly the security assurance should be credible, which can be realized by being publicized, legally binding, and infusing with further commitments. Secondly, the security assurance tailored to the unique features of the target state's concerns is more likely to be effective. Using this set of criteria, the only moderately effective assurance is that provided by the Soviet Union. The general security assurance of the UN is neither legally binding nor specifically targeted. The alliance with China exists only on paper as Pyongyang believes Beijing is reluctant to fulfill its obligation as an ally. The United States is taking a capricious attitude on the DPRK and none of its security assurances are legalized or address its major concern of regime survival. These may help explain why security assurances failed to prevent the DPRK from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Negating Non-proliferation? The Potential Sino-South Challenge to Nuclear Market Regulation

J. Alexander Thew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2023.2234284

2023-07-25

International Spectator

Abstract:Developing industrial-scale nuclear energy projects requires substantial technical expertise, access to complex fuel supply chains and long-term financial capital. For developing countries investing in civil nuclear energy programmes, securing external support is crucial. However, the nuclear technology trade market is heavily regulated and rather thin. Exporter states must balance commercial opportunity with security interests, given nuclear technology's dual use. Because of this, incumbent exporters bear responsibility in crafting and enforcing market regulations. As highlighted by the budding Chinese-Argentinian relationship, newly capable market entrants, particularly the People's Republic of China (PRC), have the potential to challenge international non-proliferation norms by fulfilling market demand where other, predominately Western, states have demurred. The strength of nuclear markets' non-proliferation-oriented regulatory structures hinges on nascent relationships between entrepreneurial exporters and participating Global South states.
U.S. ECONOMIC SANCTIONS: an Empirical Study

Jiawen Yang,Hossein Askari,John Forrer,Hildy Teegen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08853900490277341

2004-01-01

The International Trade Journal

Abstract:Using a gravity model, we conduct an empirical analysis of the impact of U.S. economic sanctions on U.S. trade with target countries and on third countries. Our findings show that the impact on U.S. trade is very sensitive to how the sanctioned country list is identified and selected. We find no significant impact of U.S. economic sanctions on trade between the United States and countries that are subject to selective sanctions. For only countries subject to comprehensive sanctions have we found a significant reduction in bilateral trade; and these same sanctions increased trade between target countries and the EU or Japan. Using a sample that includes only the formerly planned economies that were long the target of U.S. economic sanctions in recent history, our results show that U.S. economic sanctions have a significant impact on U.S. exports, imports, and total trade with these countries, and these effects have lingered for more than a decade after the Cold War had ended.
Can Monetary Policy Undo Asset-freezing Sanctions?

Hengxu Song,Pengfei Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12508

IF: 2.451

2023-01-01

China & World Economy

Abstract:This article investigates the macroeconomic consequences of foreign asset-freezing sanctions, a tool utilized by several Western nations amid recent geopolitical tensions. Specifically, it examines the repercussions of such sanctions on open economies, finding that they may experience a sharp recession and currency crisis. To quantify the impact, we develop a new Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with financial frictions and an asset-freezing channel for an open economy. We also calibrate our model to capture the unique structures of the Russian economy. The quantitative analysis of the model demonstrates that an abrupt asset-freezing sanction would lead to large output losses and high inflation increases. Our counterfactual examination reveals that higher elasticity of import substitution and lower elasticity of export substitution could alleviate the impact of foreign sanctions, whereas more aggressive monetary policy may have positive but limited stabilization effects. Notably, the monetary authority must navigate a trade-off between stabilizing output and managing inflation resulting from the cash-in-advance channel.
Financial market information flows when counteracting rogue states: The indirect effects of targeted sanction packages

Thomas Conlon,Shaen Corbet,John W. Goodell,Yang Hou,Les Oxley,Yang (Greg) Hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.10.036

IF: 2

2024-01-01

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

Abstract:This study investigates how financial sanctions packages targeting Russia influenced traditional information flow dynamics with other international financial markets and products. While providing empirical evidence regarding the use of payment systems and finance as weapons of war, it is crucial to understand if the market's response to international sanctions diminished as expectations shifted over time. Results, supported by robustness testing procedures, indicate important dynamic information flows relating to specific sanctions after the onset of the Russia-Ukraine war. In particular, those sanctions relating to the exclusion of Russia from the SWIFT payment system and those targeting banks and private wealth resulted in significant contagion effects sourced from all Russian markets examined. Such influence, however, is found to moderate and dilute as investors reconstruct their expectations and valuations. While targeted sanctions appear to impose intended market isolation, it is also associated with significant contagion effects. Although such secondary effects dissipate, they should be seen as important when implementing further targeted sanction packages.

economics
On Obama Administration's Nuclear Nonproliferation Policies

Jiang Zhenfei

2009-01-01

Abstract:After United States President Barack Obama came into office,US nuclear nonproliferation policies underwent radical transformations. These shifts are in part due to the review by Obama's administration on the nuclear nonproliferation policies of its predecessor,and in part owing to the efforts at improving the US international image and the strategic need to safeguard US leadership in world affairs. Most importantly,however,it is deemed a means to exert more pressures on North Korean and Iranian nuclear programs. Obama's changes to US nuclear nonproliferation policies are indeed helpful at putting international nuclear arms control efforts back on track. To China,US's new policy direction will bring forth multiple effects-both positive as well as negative ones. Sino-US cooperation on nuclear nonproliferation will be carried over from the Bush era,while China will benefit from the overall improvement in international security environment;however,China will need to be wary of the possible constrains to its rise,threats to its "minimal deterrence" nuclear capacity,a marginalization of its role in the Six-party Talks,as well as the uncertainties that Obama's new nuclear nonproliferation initiatives can effect on regional stability so essential to China's peaceful development.

Can Sanctions Stop Proliferation?

Sanctions for Nuclear Inhibition: Comparing Sanction Conditions between Iran and North Korea

Nuclear Proliferation and International Security Case Studies of Iran and North Korea

Research on U.S. Economic Sanctions on North Korea and the lifting process: Focusing on the lifting of Vietnam and Iran

Strategizing in a turbulent world: Analyzing the effects of international sanctions and policy shifts on corporate innovation

How Do International Conflicts Impact China’s Energy Security and Economic Growth? A Case Study of the US Economic Sanctions on Iran

The impact of U.S. economic sanctions on corporate innovation and fraud

Unleashing Innovation Under Sanctions: The Catalyst of National Culture

Cross-national sanctions and green innovation: Worldwide investigation

Economic sanctions against North Korea: The pivotal role of US–China cooperation

Who is afraid of sanctions? The macroeconomic and distributional effects of the sanctions against Iran

Cooperative Denuclearization toward North Korea

The Effects Of International Sanctions On Green Innovations

The impact of international sanctions on environmental performance

Circumventing Sanctions: The Impact of Sino-Iranian Relations On Iran Within The Middle-East Power Constellation (Case Study of Iran-Israel Proxy War in Syria)

Assessing the Effectiveness of Security Assurances on the DPRK's Nuclear Issue

Negating Non-proliferation? The Potential Sino-South Challenge to Nuclear Market Regulation

U.S. ECONOMIC SANCTIONS: an Empirical Study

Can Monetary Policy Undo Asset-freezing Sanctions?

Financial market information flows when counteracting rogue states: The indirect effects of targeted sanction packages

On Obama Administration's Nuclear Nonproliferation Policies