Cooperative Denuclearization toward North Korea

Dingli Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01636600903232251

2009-01-01

Abstract:Why has the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) been so defiant against the international community? What could be its external and internal motivations to carry out new missile tests, and...

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Korea Nuclear Crisis and the Changing Sino-DPRK Relationship

Jian Cai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2010.0000

2010-01-01

Asian Perspective

Abstract:When the DPRK conducted its first nuclear test on October 9, 2006, the second Korea nuclear crisis readied a climax, but almost everybody still believed in that North Korea was just playing a political card. After it conducted a second nuclear test on May 25, 2009, most people changed their thoughts and concluded that the Six Party Talks which aimed to solve the crisis are a total failure. This article analyzes the reasons and purposes for the DPRK's nuclear tests, considers the origin and development of the Six Party Talks, and concludes that the talks, while frustrating to various parties, have not been a total failure since they were moving in the right direction. The article examines the changing Sino-DPRK relationship and concludes that China should develop a long-term strategy toward the Korean peninsula and change its diplomatic policy toward the DPRK.
The North Korean Missile and Nuclear Crises: China's Historic and Strategic Stakes on the Korean Peninsula

Eric Teo Chu Cheow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10163270609464118

2006-12-01

Korean Journal of Defense Analysis

Abstract:The article analyzes the recent troubled relationship between China and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), following the July missile tests and the October nuclear test. One would wonder if Pyongyang was countering a potential Sino-Russian-Japanese rapprochement in the making, given the fortuitous timing of the nuclear test. One could also wonder if Pyongyang was playing a “provocative role” against a relative Sino-South Korea “rapprochement,” as Pyongyang may fear being “nailed” by all this rapprochement, thus losing its own diplomatic hand eventually on the Korean Peninsula. A recap of the tumultuous history of Sino-Korean relations could offer some clues, as Pyongyang would have attempted to play traditional power politics, like in the past 320 years, whereas China would ensure not being “sucked” into conflicts and controversies over Korea, as history has shown. The entree of the United States into the Korean fray via the Portsmouth Treaty (September 1905) and the Taft-Katusra “Agreement” (July 1905) was significant, as Washington had then joined Beijing, Tokyo and Moscow in “balancing” Korean forces on the Peninsula, a fact that has not changed fundamentally till today. But there is also a fundamental shift operating, as Seoul further distances itself from Washington's hard-line policy and “shifts” toward a softer line espoused by Beijing vis-à-vis Pyongyang, clearly for commercial and affinity-related issues. Finally, Beijing could have been deemed to have scored a diplomatic triumph from its “initial disappointment” and Pyongyang's “hanran” (meaning brazen or flagrant) action, following its missile and nuclear tests; the DPRK will likely return to the Six-Party Talks in December, thus giving Beijing a decisive diplomatic triumph on the Korean peninsula.

international relations
Bringing the Dprk Back to the Six-Party Talks

Shen Dingli

2016-01-01

Abstract:Given that it is almost impossible to denuclearize the DPRK via sanctions or preemption, the only viable option to cope with its nuclear challenge is to talk with it. This paper suggests a realistic approach toward eventual nuclear dismantlement of the DPRK, by combining short-term unilateral nuclear arms control measures with medium and long-term nuclear disarmament. Such a "capping, reversing and eliminating" strategy is designed to entice Pyongyang to halt further nuclear and missile development, while keeping alive the aim of complete denuclearization in the long run. In the interim, the DPRK will be offered the opportunity to develop a normal relationship with the international community.
Security of Korean Peninsula and China's Tactics for Cooperation with Relevant Parties

LIU Sai-li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7411.2010.06.006

2010-01-01

Abstract:From DPRK's experimental nuclear explosion to the recent Cheonan incident,the security situation of Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia changed greatly.The settlement of the issue will involve many parties and even the entire international community.China should properly handle its relations with the United States,deepen mutual trust,consensus and cooperation among China,Japan and the ROK,strengthen its communication and cooperation with Russia and the international community,and resolutely urge the DPRK to give up its nuclear arms plan so as to realize the denuclearization of the Peninsula and through the leverage of economic diplomacy,encourage it to merge into international community.While seeking to solve the crisis of the Peninsula through diplomatic negotiations,China should also get prepared to cope with any war that might break out on the Peninsula all of a sudden.
The Dilemma of Sino-North Korea Relations: Focusing on Military Provocation of North Korea

Yong-guk Han,Sangjun Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29159/kjas.41.2.55

2023-06-30

Abstract:This paper examines how China's response to similar military provocations such as North Korea's ICBM launch in 2017 and 2022, has changed and analyzes the causes of the change at the level of individual, national, and international systems. China generally dealt with North Korea in terms of cooperation with the United States in 2017 and clearly sent a message of concern and opposition to North Korea's serial nuclear tests and military provocations. This was to prevent China from being involved in North Korea's provocations, while stably managing Sino-U.S. relations and dispelling the theory of Chinese responsibility raised by the international community. However, instead of worrying about the involvement in North Korea's provocations, China has recently defended North Korea's position and shifted the blame to the U.S. Why is this change occurring in China's response? As a result of the study, it is observed that China was excluded from the discussion centered on the South, North, and the U.S. during the 2018-19 denuclearization negotiations, and that China experienced concerns that North Korea might break away from its alliance beyond its problem of diminishing influence on the Korean Peninsula. China's recent changes in response to North Korea's provocations are attributed to complex internal and external factors such as Trump's unpredictable behavior, domestic political circumstances of China and North Korea, the Sino-U.S. conflict since 2018 and the prolonged Ukraine crisis.

Political Science
Negotiations On The Denuclearisation Of North Korea: A Critical Evaluation Of Summit Diplomacy

Edward Kwon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2022.2076473

2022-06-07

Asian Affairs

Abstract:This article analyzes a series of summit diplomacy efforts by the former United States President Donald Trump, and South Korea's President Moon Jae-in, to persuade North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to give up the country's nuclear weapons program. Through critical evaluation of the summits between Trump and Kim as well as Moon and Kim, the paper provides several important lessons on how to deal with North Korea. Kim Jong Un's mindset and strategic calculation of a denuclearization deal with Trump, amid the recent progress of North Korea's nuclear weapons and ICBMs programs, are investigated. Given the failure to reach a denuclearization agreement at the Hanoi Summit, Pyongyang is not expected readily to give up its nuclear weapons. North Korea had temporarily refrained from severe military provocations, such as test-firing ICBMs or conducting another round of nuclear weapon experiments by self-moratorium since April 2018. However, Pyongyang reversed direction with this policy in 2022 and resumed coercive diplomacy in order to achieve its desired goals. As North Korea's incessant efforts to advance its nuclear weapons and ICBMs programs brings with a dismal outlook for peace building both on the Korean Peninsula and the world, this paper investigates a series of policy lessons to manage the North Korean nuclear crisis.
Defending the United States: Revisiting National Missile Defense against North Korea

Jaganath Sankaran,Steve Fetter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00426

2022-02-25

International Security

Abstract:Abstract North Korea has made significant strides in its attempt to acquire a strategic nuclear deterrent. In 2017, it tested intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and completed a series of nuclear test explosions. These may provide North Korea with the technical foundation to deploy a nuclear-armed ICBM capable of striking the United States. The Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) missile defense system is intended to deter North Korean nuclear coercion and, if deterrence fails, to defeat a limited North Korean attack. Despite two decades of dedicated and costly efforts, however, the GMD system remains unproven and unreliable. It has not demonstrated an ability to defeat the relatively simple and inexpensive countermeasures that North Korea can field. The GMD system has suffered persistent delays, substantial cost increases, and repeated program failures because of the politically motivated rush to deploy in the 1990s. But GMD and other U.S. missile defense efforts have provoked serious concerns in Russia and China, who fear it may threaten their nuclear deterrents. Diplomacy and deterrence may reassure Russia and China while constraining North Korea's nuclear program. An alternate airborne boost-phase intercept system may offer meaningful defense against North Korean missiles without threatening the Russian or Chinese deterrents.

international relations
Deepening Predicament of International Security:The DPRK's Nuclear Test and Its Empirical Implications

ZHU Feng

2006-01-01

Abstract:International non-proliferation regime is the benchmark of post-Cold War security in the world.However,the debate between proliferation pessimists and optimists has never stopped despite of the internationally shared consensus of pushing nuclear nonproliferation agenda.The DPRK's nuclear test on October 9 of 2006 explicitly induces new imperatives into the daunting question of if nuclear nonproliferation is inevitable.Pyongyang's top leader accounts mostly for his decision to test nuclear bomb,rather than his strong demand for securing the country.The ongoing debate on nuclear proliferation urges new growing necessity of introducing new analytical framework into non-proliferation study.
Analysis of policy changes from Denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula to North Korea's Denuclearization in response to the North Korean Nuclear Threat

Hye Won Yang,Keun Hwan Yoo,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37181/jscs.2024.8.2.033

2024-04-30

Taegu Science University Defense Security Institute

Abstract:The Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula came into effect on February 19, 1992, after South Korea and North Korea agreed on December 31, 1991. North Korea unilaterally broke and did not keep the joint declaration on the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. The Yoon Seok-yeol government emphasized that it would push for North Korea's denuclearization and bring about practical changes based on principles. North Korea's denuclearization can be said to be a clear expression of the fact that North Korea is the one who caused the nuclear problem and that North Korea must get rid of its nuclear weapons. North Korea's denuclearization is a concept that clearly indicates that North Korea is the entity that must fundamentally change its position in order to uphold Article 1 of the Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. By using the somewhat ambiguous expression 'denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula', concerns about South Korea's response ability that could lead to a security vacuum have been dispelled and it has been made clear that North Korea must give up its nuclear weapons. The more North Korea pours money into nuclear weapons, the more dangerous it is for the human rights of the North Korean people. The cost of North Korea making nuclear weapons and testing missiles should be spent on improving food and human rights for North Korean people. South Korea must denuclearize North Korea so that its people can escape from hunger and lead North Korea down the path of reform and openness.
Military and Economic Power Networks, Hedging, and Cooperation on the Korean Peninsula

Jonathan Ring,Wonjae Hwang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2020.60.6.1090

2020-11-01

Asian Survey

Abstract:Is the Kim Jong-un regime genuinely pursuing a peaceful solution, to eventually give up its nuclear arsenal, after a series of summits and negotiations with the US and South Korea? We examine how military and economic power networks on the peninsula are associated with the prospect of North Korea’s denuclearization. North Korea could use its nuclear weapons program, an internal tool designed to promote national security and power, to build up power in both military and economic power networks. Drawing lessons and speculation from the literature on states’ hedging behavior, and using agent-based models, we explain that denuclearization as part of a hedging strategy would be a viable policy option for North Korea.

area studies
Dialogue with John Dunn on Korean Denuclearization

Sang-Jin Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419867465

2019-08-07

Theory, Culture and Society

Abstract:This dialogue addresses the global risk that broke out of the North Korean development of nuclear weapons and missiles. It starts from the brutal consequences of the national division for Korea and asks why North Korea has been so preoccupied with nuclear projects as has been found to be the case since the 1990s, and how much and why Kim Jung-un today differs from his father in terms of his future, and where the fundamental limit lies in Moon Jae-In’s as well as Trump’s approaches to Korean denuclearization and peace. The highlight of this dialogue is to explain the intrinsic difficulties for Donald Trump and Kim Jung-un in finding a reasonable solution to their respective demands for denuclearization and regime security, and explore the likely future of the Korean Peninsula from the vantage point of Kim Dae-jung’s Sunshine Policy and metamorphosis.
From a buffer zone to a strategic burden: evolving Sino-North Korea relations during the Hu Jintao era

Heungkyu Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10163270903526359

2010-03-01

Korean Journal of Defense Analysis

Abstract:The purpose of this article is to understand China's changing strategic views on North Korea during Hu Jintao's era and to consider the implications for South Korea's policies toward North Korea and China. Sino-North Korea cooperation can be theoretically explained by the alliance transition theory, a modified one from the political realist perspective. The implications of the alliance transition theory are that China would strengthen its alliance with North Korea, seek to weaken the South Korea–U.S. alliance, and induce South Korea to cooperate with China, while preventing North Korea from getting close to the United States. However, it is noteworthy that even in China, there exist various groups of strategic thinking in international relations on China's roles in North Korean issues. North Korea's incessant provocations have effects on mobilizing the Developing Country Diplomacy School as well as the Rising Great Power Diplomacy School against North Korea. Such incidences would soon reverse the rule of thumb of North Korea's strategic value rising alongside regional tensions, calling into question in China, again, the strategic value of North Korea. China still maintains its previous policy priorities at askance, but since North Korea's second nuclear test, the contents have been changing reflecting the changing security environments and its recalculation of national interests. As the more the North Korean nuclear crisis deepens, threatening peace and stability on the Korean peninsula, the more China would positively think over North Korea's contingency intensifying cooperation with the United States. In such transition, the stronger the rising great power thinkers, the less the diplomatic space for North Korea exists. North Korea would stop being a buffer zone but a strategic burden in their perspective, transforming China's relationship with North Korea from a special relationship to a normal state-to-state relationship.

international relations
Economic sanctions against North Korea: The pivotal role of US–China cooperation

Woo-Jun Min,Sukhee Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865920901896

2020-03-19

International Area Studies Review

Abstract:At the beginning of 2018, North Korea halted its long-range nuclear- and ballistic-missile development programs and announced that it was willing to denuclearize. Soon afterwards, it reached out to countries including the US, China and South Korea. This sudden change in behavior marked the end of six years of extreme isolation under Kim Jong-un’s leadership. To explain why North Korea decided to reach out when it did, the present study examines the 2006–2018 economic sanctions levied on North Korea under the US maximum-pressure policy, carried out partly in cooperation with China. The findings suggest that economic sanctions were ineffective between 2006 and 2016 for two reasons: the lack of cooperation between the US and China, and China’s policy of assisting North Korea. In 2006–2016, China and North Korea had shared values and high volumes of trade; there were no clear signs of cooperation between the US and China. However, as trade between China and North Korea began to decrease in late 2017 and early 2018, there were signs of cooperation between the US and China, and changes in North Korean behavior. North Korea came to the negotiating table largely to lift the economic sanctions, which were strengthened by cooperation between the US and China. Increased economic pressure compelled North Korea to normalize its relations with the US, China and South Korea.
Compellence and batna for the Denuclearization of North Korea

Hwee-rhak Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-bja10094

2023-08-30

International Negotiation

Abstract:Abstract This article analyzes the denuclearization negotiations with North Korea and recommends options to compel North Korea to denuclearize, focusing on the best alternative to a negotiated agreement ( batna ) concept. President Trump’s recent denuclearization summit meetings with North Korea failed because he did not employ a batna in his negotiations. A few candidates for the batna are compared and evaluated using criteria of effectiveness and feasibility. This article concludes that military strikes or economic sanctions cannot be relevant as batna s because of North Korea’s success in developing its second-strike nuclear capabilities and probable Chinese support. While South Korea’s nuclear armament does not seem feasible in the short term, another nuclear-sharing arrangement in Northeast or East Asia could be a viable and practical batna . The United States and South Korea should implement this batna gradually, reflecting the degree of the nuclear threat from North Korea.
Deciphering Consistency and Coherence in U.S Foreign Policy: North Korea under Trump and Biden

Adam Taim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47604/jir.2819

2024-07-30

Abstract:Propose: This study investigated how consistent and coherent U.S. foreign policy toward North Korea was under President Trump and Biden. Methodology: Through qualitative analysis of policy shifts and diplomatic strategies, this paper explored how effectively both administrations advanced their policy objectives within the intricate dynamics of U.S.-North Korea relations. Data were collected from primary sources like official government documents and secondary sources like academic journal articles and media reports. Thematic and content analyses were employed to identify recurring motifs and evaluate the articulation and implementation of policy strategies. Findings: Findings indicated that Trump's untraditional approach of involving North Korean leader Kim Jong-un directly, alongside a "maximum pressure" campaign, yielded mixed outcomes. While it broke long-standing diplomatic deadlocks, it faced challenges such as inconsistencies and limited progress on denuclearization. In contrast, Biden's administration focused on multilateralism, alliance-building, and a structured policy framework. Nonetheless, it also encountered several challenges in making tangible progress toward denuclearization. The study underscored the importance of future U.S. administrations integrating the strengths of both approaches to enhance foreign policy effectiveness. Unique Contribution to Theory Practice and Policy: This study improved understanding of contemporary international relations by dissecting American interactions with North Korea under two different administrations. It provided crucial insights for policymakers, highlighting how maintaining consistency and coherence is pivotal in forming effective foreign policy.
Building an "association of Trans-Korean Peninsula Nations" and China's Role Toward the RPG Approach

Qin Zhu,Xiuyu Fang

2019-01-01

Korean Journal of Defense Analysis

Abstract:Tensions flared for a time after North Korea's fifth and sixth nuclear tests as well as THAAD's entry into South Korea. This paper extends the view that the root cause of these issues is the lack of regional public goods (RPGs) on the Korean Peninsula, and its insufficiency results from three major conflicts in the politico-economic situation of the Peninsula. In order to resolve the issues and maintain lasting peace, three specific aspects, i.e., in diplomacy, security and economy, are to be addressed in carrying out the long-term mission of supplying RPGs to the Peninsula. For effective operation and comprehensive management of the RPGs provision, an integration platform with powerful commitments is called for, i.e., "Association of Trans-Korean Peninsula Nations" (ATKPN) co-established by China, the United States, and the two Koreas. Apart from the dilemma commonly identified in the delivery of RPGs, the ATKPN also faces dilemmas specifically from the Northeast Asian order. To overcome the ATKPN's obstacles, concerted efforts are needed to promote the institutionalization of Sino-U.S. "new type of great power relations," to transform the function of the alliance system, and to cultivate the awareness of "common external threats."
Assessing the Effectiveness of Security Assurances on the DPRK's Nuclear Issue

Yi Ding,Dingli Shen

2019-01-01

Abstract:In the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)'s case of nuclear proliferation, less attention has been paid to the role of security assurances. This paper seeks to assess the role of security assurances for the DPRK provided by the UN, the Soviet Union, China, and the United States and to figure out why these assurances are less effective to bridle its nuclear ambition. It argues that an effective security assurance for nuclear non-proliferation should meet at least two conditions. Firstly the security assurance should be credible, which can be realized by being publicized, legally binding, and infusing with further commitments. Secondly, the security assurance tailored to the unique features of the target state's concerns is more likely to be effective. Using this set of criteria, the only moderately effective assurance is that provided by the Soviet Union. The general security assurance of the UN is neither legally binding nor specifically targeted. The alliance with China exists only on paper as Pyongyang believes Beijing is reluctant to fulfill its obligation as an ally. The United States is taking a capricious attitude on the DPRK and none of its security assurances are legalized or address its major concern of regime survival. These may help explain why security assurances failed to prevent the DPRK from acquiring nuclear weapons.
China-U.S. Relations and the Security of the Korean Peninsula

Fang Xiu-yu,Xin Hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22883/kjda.2013.25.3.004

2013-01-01

Abstract:This article outlines the general framework of bilateral relations between China and the United States, and identifies their central strategic interests that are embodied in their respective policies toward the Korea Peninsula. Based on this elaboration, the authors further explore the divergences and convergences of the Chinese and American security strategies and foreign policies on issues related to Korea, with a focus on the effects of North Korea's latest nuclear test in February 2013 on their respective interests and attitudes. In conclusion, the authors offer some practical approaches that might be jointly implemented by China and the United States in their handling of Korea-related issues. The authors argue that, despite the complexities of China-U.S. bilateral relations and some potential sources of hostility between them, China and the United States can still manage to establish a mechanism to stabilize the Korea Peninsula through joint efforts.
Choice on Chinese Policy to Korean Peninsula in Post North-Korea's Nuclear Weapon Time

Zheng Jiyong

2009-01-01

Abstract:After North Korea conducted Nuclear Weapon test,the security situation in Northeast Asia got into"Post-North Korea Nuclear Issue Era".This situation brought great challenge to Chinese diplomacy.Chinese policy and cognition on Northeast Asia have been changing and developing obviously.Facing"Post-North Korea Nuclear Issue Era",international politics in Northeast Asia is going on profound changes.Now new trends will appear on the Overall situation,the relations between China and Korean Peninsula,and the situation inside Korean Peninsula.Those changes will promote the development of orientation on Chinese Korean Peninsula policy.
Politics of Disarmament: A Case Study of North Korea and Iran

Emem Nyenwe,Jennifer Uchendu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48028/iiprds/ijedesr.v8.i1.05

2024-04-17

Abstract:The politics of disarmament in North Korea and Iran is a complex interplay of global power dynamics, regional security concerns, and the pursuit of national interests. Both nations' endeavours to develop nuclear capabilities have spurred intense international scrutiny, prompting multifaceted negotiations and diplomatic efforts to curb their nuclear programmes. North Korea's persistent pursuit of nuclear capabilities has sparked global tensions, leading to extensive diplomatic engagements involving key stakeholders. Despite intermittent breakthroughs, achieving complete denuclearization remains elusive, reflecting the challenges of negotiating with a regime known for its unpredictability. Similarly, Iran's nuclear ambitions have positioned it at the heart of a protracted diplomatic standoff. The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme but faced complications following the US withdrawal and subsequent sanctions, highlighting the intricate dynamics of geopolitical interests and regional rivalry. The quest for disarmament in both countries navigates a complex web of historical animosities, domestic politics, and security concerns. Achieving meaningful progress requires delicate diplomacy, fostering trust, addressing underlying security issues, and offering credible incentives for disarmament. Understanding the politics of disarmament in North Korea and Iran requires a nuanced comprehension of global power shifts, regional complexities, and the delicate balance between national sovereignty and international obligations. Resolving these challenges demands sustained multilateral engagement and a comprehensive approach that acknowledges the intricate interdependencies shaping global security.

Cooperative Denuclearization toward North Korea

The Korea Nuclear Crisis and the Changing Sino-DPRK Relationship

The North Korean Missile and Nuclear Crises: China's Historic and Strategic Stakes on the Korean Peninsula

Bringing the Dprk Back to the Six-Party Talks

Security of Korean Peninsula and China's Tactics for Cooperation with Relevant Parties

The Dilemma of Sino-North Korea Relations: Focusing on Military Provocation of North Korea

Negotiations On The Denuclearisation Of North Korea: A Critical Evaluation Of Summit Diplomacy

Defending the United States: Revisiting National Missile Defense against North Korea

Deepening Predicament of International Security:The DPRK's Nuclear Test and Its Empirical Implications

Analysis of policy changes from Denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula to North Korea's Denuclearization in response to the North Korean Nuclear Threat

Military and Economic Power Networks, Hedging, and Cooperation on the Korean Peninsula

Dialogue with John Dunn on Korean Denuclearization

From a buffer zone to a strategic burden: evolving Sino-North Korea relations during the Hu Jintao era

Economic sanctions against North Korea: The pivotal role of US–China cooperation

Compellence and batna for the Denuclearization of North Korea

Deciphering Consistency and Coherence in U.S Foreign Policy: North Korea under Trump and Biden

Building an "association of Trans-Korean Peninsula Nations" and China's Role Toward the RPG Approach

Assessing the Effectiveness of Security Assurances on the DPRK's Nuclear Issue

China-U.S. Relations and the Security of the Korean Peninsula

Choice on Chinese Policy to Korean Peninsula in Post North-Korea's Nuclear Weapon Time

Politics of Disarmament: A Case Study of North Korea and Iran