(037) Medicolegal Considerations for Patients Undergoing Urologic Surgical Interventions and the Development of an Audio-Recording Application for Use During Genital Gender-affirming Surgical Consultation
J Stelmar,S Mallavarapu,S Sandhu,S Smith,M Garcia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.033
2024-02-01
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Patient recollection of details discussed during medical consultation is often limited (Figure 1a). For genital gender-affirming surgery (gGAS) consultations, lengthy discussions and deep contemplation surrounding surgical options are critical. Inadequate communication can result in patient complaints and medico-legal action, whereupon issues such as a lack of discussion or poor documentation can lead to medico-legal liability against the care provider and hospital system. As a result, strategies must be developed to ensure that information discussed during complex medical consultations are made available so patients can properly weigh out the care options presented. Objective 1) Assess medico-legal incidents in Urologic and surgical specialties in the UK, US, and a Californian quaternary care center, 2) evaluate the advantages and feasibility of offering audio-recordings of patient consultations, and 3) create a user-friendly smartphone app for recording healthcare consultations. Methods A literature review evaluated current evidence on medical liability claims in the UK and US was conducted. Additionally, our center's Department of Risk Management provided information pertaining to medico-legal cases against our institution. Separately, gGAS patients consented to audio-record their consultation. Copies were provided to patients and kept in their medical records. A follow-up survey assessed its usefulness, and based upon patient feedback, a smartphone application was developed. Results A PubMed search yielded 921 results on "medical malpractice claims" from 2013-2023. In Urologic Surgery, 32 papers addressed medical malpractice, with 2 providing data over the last 15 years. In the UK, 660 claims were made from 2010-2020, of which 8.2% were due to poor communication (37 = informed consent; 17 = lack of follow-up). In the US, from 2020-2022, 38.3% of Urologists faced at least one legal proceeding in their career, and 5.3% were sued within 1 year for any reason. Our institution's Department of Risk Management reported 32% of lawsuits were related to surgical care. Informed consent involved 8% of cases and had a component in 32%. The average financial settlement for medical malpractice was $125,000.00 USD, and trial costs averaged $75,000.00 USD. 50/71 patients completed an anonymized, online survey post-audio recording. Positive results were noted regarding recording quality, comfort whilst being recorded, and wishes for future consultation recordings (Figure 1b). In addition, most patients felt less anxiety, and had greater confidence in their treatment choice (Figure 1c) Based upon patient responses, we developed a smartphone App which records 90 minutes of audio, allows for file and hyperlink attachments to be sent to patients before immediately deleting all information (Figure 1d). Routine use of audio-recordings led to a reduction in patient queries to our office. Conclusions Routine audio recording of patient consultations provides significant benefits with minimal cost to providers. As per our institution's Office of Risk Management, it offers protection against medico-legal risks. Adequate discussion, good documentation and providing adjuncts for patients can help prevent a large proportion of medicolegal complaints in addition to optimizing patient care. Considering that patients face similar challenges across different disciplines and regions, a larger study (multi-center, international, multi-language) is warranted. Disclosure No.
urology & nephrology