Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

S&T Configuration and Strength Analysis of the Max Planck Society

Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics

Practical Application and Research Advances of Long-Span Space Structures

On Traits and Developing Patterns of International Sci-tech Talents:From the Perspective of Bibliometric Research

In-depth Analysis of International Collaboration and Inter-Institutional Collaboration in Nuclear Science and Technology During 2006–2015

Regional Analysis on Chinese Scientific Output

Mapping of Metal-Organic Frameworks Publications: A Bibliometric Analysis

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Strength the Theory Research on Science & Technology Resource and Allocation

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Spies Within Metal-Organic Frameworks: Investigating Metal Centers Using Solid-State Nmr

Leadership in Cooperation: A Scientometrics Analysis on China's Participation in International Science and Technology Cooperation

A Comparative Analysis of Publication Portfolios of Selected Economies.

A scientometrics analysis on the disciplinary characteristics of Chinese science publications

Structure maps for MAX phases formability revisited

Bibliometrics Analysis Of Science And Technology Policy In China

Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea?

The science, technology and innovation policy studies in China: A scientometric analysis

SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK OF THE MAJOR PROJECT "DESIGN AND PREPARATION OF MULTI-SCALE STRUCTURE FOR STRENGTHENING AND TOUGHENING OF METALLIC MATERIALS"