Synthesis and improved electrochemical performances of porous Li 3V2(PO4)3/C spheres as cathode material for lithium-ion batteries
YanQiang Qiao,Jiangping Tu,Xiuli Wang,D. Zhang,J.Y. Xiang,Yongjin Mai,Changdong Gu.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.04.057
IF: 9.2
2011-01-01
Journal of Power Sources
Abstract:Spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C composites are synthesized by a soft chemistry route using hydrazine hydrate as the spheroidizing medium. The electrochemical properties of the materials are investigated by galvanostatic charge–discharge tests, cyclic voltammograms and electrochemical impedance spectrum. The porous Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C spheres exhibit better electrochemical performances than the solid ones. The spherical porous Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C electrode shows a high discharge capacity of 129.1 and 125.6 mAh g −1 between 3.0 and 4.3 V, and 183.8 and 160.9 mAh g −1 between 3.0 and 4.8 V at 0.2 and 1 C, respectively. Even at a charge–discharge rate of 15 C, this material can still deliver a discharge capacity of 100.5 and 121.5 mAh g −1 in the potential regions of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V, respectively. The excellent electrochemical performance can be attributed to the porous structure, which can make the lithium ion diffusion and electron transfer more easily across the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /electrolyte interfaces, thus resulting in enhanced electrode reaction kinetics and improved electrochemical performance. Keywords Lithium vanadium phosphate Porous sphere Hydrazine hydrate Lithium ion battery 1 Introduction Monoclinic Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 has attracted extensive interest as a potential cathode material for lithium-ion batteries due to its good ion mobility, high theoretical capacity (197 mAh g −1 ) and high operating voltage [1,2] . Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 possesses a NASICON-type structure consisting of slightly distorted VO 6 octahedra and PO 4 tetrahedra that share oxygen vertices with mobile Li + ions housed within the framework [1,3,4] . This NASICON-type structure with relatively larger interstitial space created by the PO 4 3− units is in favor of the fast ionic conductivity [5–8] . However, Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 as well as LiFePO 4 have a problem of low intrinsic electronic conductivity (2.4 × 10 −7 S cm −1 ) [9] , which greatly impedes their practical application. To solve this problem, various methods have been employed to overcome this disadvantage, such as doping with foreign atoms [10–14] , decreasing the particle size [5,15] and carbon coating [16–27] . As has been reported in previous publication [15] , nanosized Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 favors excellent electrochemical performance due to the enhanced specific surface area and reduced diffusion length of the ions and electrons in the electrode. However, the nanosized particles are unfavorable for electrode preparation because they have very high specific surface area and high surface energy [28–30] . Further, nanosized particles have the drawback of electrochemical agglomeration during electrochemical cycling [28] . It has been reported [28–36] that the spherical morphology has many advantages in comparison with irregular aggregation such as higher volumetric energy density, lower interfacial energy, higher tap density and better fluidity characteristics. Traditionally, spray drying method is one of the most widely used techniques for preparation of spherical materials such as in the case of LiMn 2 O 4 [37] and LiFePO 4 [29,30,38,39] . Recently, Wang et al. [40] successfully synthesized spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 by using N 2 H 4 as reducer and the material exhibited initial discharge capacities of 123 mAh g −1 (0.2 C) and 132 mAh g −1 (0.5 C) in the potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V, respectively. In the present work, we present a soft chemistry route to obtain spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C by using hydrazine hydrate as the spheroidizing medium. Hydrazine hydrate was also acting as a reducer to reduce partially V 5+ to lower valence at room temperature and then carbothermal reduction method was performed at high temperature to obtain the spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C. Herein, porous Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C spheres can be obtained by adjusting the pH value of the solution. Porous spherical particles show great advantages such as good contact with electrolyte, high specific surface area, quick Li + permeation and easier to bind than isolated nanosized particles [29,30,38,39] . Therefore, we prepared two types of spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C composites with porous and solid structures and their electrochemical performances were investigated. 2 Experimental The spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C composites were synthesized using a soft chemistry route followed by a carbothermal reduction synthesis. Here, hydrazine hydrate was used as the spheroidizing medium and 1,4-dihydroxy-2-butyne was employed as the carbon source. First, NH 4 VO 3 (5 g) was added to 20 mL of deionized water under magnetic stirring to obtain a white turbid liquid. Then stoichiometric of 30 mL LiOH·H 2 O (2.83 g) solution was added to the above white turbid liquid under magnetic stirring at room temperature until a transparent solution was formed. An appropriate quantity of hydrazine hydrate was added dropwise to this transparent solution under magnetic stirring until the solution was become to straw yellow. Afterward, 30 mL of (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 (8.465 g) solution and 30 mL of 1,4-dihydroxy-2-butyne (2 g) solution were added to the straw yellow solution gradually. The resulting solution with a pH value of 9.0–10.0 was transferred into a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) container and sealed at 200 °C for 12 h, and then cooled to room temperature. Finally, the resulting precursor was washed with deionized water, separated by centrifugation for several times and dried at 60 °C (denoted as precursor-1). The processing conditions of the precursor of porous Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C spheres (denoted as precursor-2) were the same as those of the precursor-1 except the pH value of the solution was adjusted at 13.0–14.0 by adding appropriate of ammonia before transferred into the PTFE container. The two precursors were sintered at 750 °C for 10 h under Ar flow in a tube furnace to obtain the spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C powders. The final product obtained from precursor-1 was solid sphere (denoted as SS-LVP/C), while the product obtained from precursor-2 was porous sphere (denoted as PS-LVP/C). The morphologies and structures of the as-synthesized powders were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, FEI SIRION) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Philips PC-APD with Cu Kα radiation). The residual carbon contents of the powders were determined by means of an automatic elemental analyzer (EA, Flash EA1112). Raman scattering spectroscopy (LABRAM HR-800) was recorded at room temperature with the wave number shift among 4000–100 cm −1 in ultraviolet laser excitation line of 325 nm. Electrochemical performances of the spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C composites were investigated using CR2025 coin-type cell. A metallic lithium foil served as the anode electrode. The cathode consisted of 85 wt.% active material, 10 wt.% acetylene black and 5 wt.% polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) on aluminum foil. 1 M LiPF 6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)–dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1 in volume) as the electrolyte, and a polypropylene micro-porous film (Cellgard 2300) as the separator. The cells were assembled in a glove box filled with high-purity argon. The charge–discharge tests were conducted on LAND battery program-control test system (Wuhan, China) between 3.0 and 4.3 V, 3.0 and 4.8 V by applying from 0.1 to 15 C current densities at room temperature, respectively. For electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements, the test cells were with the metallic lithium foil as both the reference and counter electrodes. EIS measurements were performed on CHI660C electrochemical workstation over a frequency range of 100 kHz to 10 mHz at a stage of discharge (3.0 V) by applying an AC signal of 5 mV. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed on this electrochemical workstation in the potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V (vs. Li/Li + ) at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s −1 , respectively. 3 Results and discussion Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of SS-LVP/C and PS-LVP/C composites. The diffraction peaks of both samples can be attributed to monoclinic Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 with the space group of P2 1 /n (ICSD #96962). Although about 11 wt.% 1,4-dihydroxy-2-butyne (carbon source) of total weight of the raw materials is used for the preparation of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C composites, the residual carbon is not detected in the XRD patterns since the state of the carbon is amorphous, or the amount of carbon is too small to be detected. However, according to elemental analysis, the carbon content in the final products is 2.87 and 2.62 wt.% for the SS-LVP/C and PS-LVP/C samples, respectively. Raman scattering results also indicate the presence of residual carbon in the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C composites, as shown in Fig. 2 . In the two Raman spectra, two intense broad bands at 1590 cm −1 and 1353 cm −1 are attributed to the graphite band (G-band) and the disorder-induced phonon mode (D-band), respectively. According to the fitting results, the I D / I G value of the SS-LVP/C and PS-LVP/C composite is 0.88 and 0.87, respectively. This suggests that the graphite-like carbon in the residual carbon is about 50%, which is similar to the previous reports [7,18] . It is believed that low ratio value ( I D / I G ) of carbon coating is helpful for improving the electronic conductivity and electrochemical performance of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 [7,18] . In addition, there are three broad Raman bands at 1136, 1050 and 970 cm −1 , which can be assigned to the vibrations of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 [41] . Fig. 3 shows the SEM images of precursors and spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C powders. As seen in Fig. 3 a, precursor-1 has a spherical morphology but with a non-uniform size distribution. The observed spheres are 0.5–7 μm in sizes. In Fig. 3 b, precursor-2 also shows spherical morphology but with a relatively good uniformity of 2–5 μm in sizes. It is also found that the surface of precursor-1 is more smooth and denser than that of precursor-2. It is clearly seen that the pH value has an obvious influence on the morphologies of the precursors, which may have significant impact on the characteristics of the final products. After the heat treatment at 750 °C for 10 h, both of the samples remain spherical morphologies. For SS-LVP/C, the spheres are solid ( Fig. 3 a′ and a′′). In contrast to SS-LVP/C, the PS-LVP/C particles contain a large number of internal pores ( Fig. 3 b′ and b′′). Large solid aggregates of the as-synthesized SS-LVP/C powder would seriously impede its electrochemical performance. However, the porous structure can promote good electrical contact among the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 particles and help the electrolyte to penetrate the material, thus highly favors the solid-state diffusion kinetics and improves the capacity of the electrode material [29,30,42] . Fig. 4 shows initial charge–discharge curves of the SS-LVP/C and PS-LVP/C composites in the potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V. Between 3.0 and 4.3 V, the cells exhibit three charge plateaus and correspondingly three discharge plateaus ( Fig. 4 a and b), which are identified as the two-phase transition processes during the electrochemical reactions [5] . Between 3.0 and 4.8 V, all three of the Li + ions can be extracted and four charge plateaus are found during the charge process ( Fig. 4 c and d), but the discharge process exhibits three discharge plateaus, which are similar to the previous reports [1,17,40] . However, with the increase of charge–discharge rate, these plateaus become shorter and the differences of the charge and discharge plateaus become larger gradually which can be attributed to the electrode polarization at high rates. It is clearly seen that the PS-LVP/C electrode presents higher discharge capacities than SS-LVP/C. For instance, the PS-LVP/C electrode can deliver a discharge capacity of 129.1, 125.6, 115.7 and 100.5 mAh g −1 between 3.0 and 4.3 V at 0.2, 1, 10 and 15 C rate, respectively, while the SS-LVP/C electrode is 117.7, 109, 68.3 and 57.7 mAh g −1 , respectively. Between 3.0 and 4.8 V, the discharge capacity of the PS-LVP/C electrode at 0.2, 1, 10 and 15 C rate is 183.8, 160.9, 134.5 and 121.5 mAh g −1 , respectively, whereas the SS-LVP/C electrode exhibits 156.3, 134.5, 55.5 and 30.7 mAh g −1 , respectively. Fig. 5 presents the rate capability of SS-LVP/C and PS-LVP/C composites in the potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V. It is also clearly seen that the PS-LVP/C electrode shows excellent rate capability. When the charge–discharge rate is decreased to 0.1 C, the discharge capacity of the PS-LVP/C electrode can still reach 122.0 and 161.4 mAh g −1 in the potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V, respectively. CV curves of SS-LVP/C and PS-LVP/C composites in the potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V are shown in Fig. 6 . Both the electrodes present three couples of oxidation and reduction peaks between 3.0 and 4.3 V ( Fig. 6 a, labeled as a′/a, b′/b and c′/c), while in the potential range of 3.0–4.8 V, four oxidation peaks (labeled as d′, e′, f′ and g) and three reduction peaks (labeled as d, e and f) can be observed in the curves ( Fig. 6 b). These results are in good agreement with the charge–discharge plateaus presented in Fig. 4 and some previous publications [6,22] . Notably, the CV curves of PS-LVP/C composite exhibit more highly symmetrical and sharper anodic/cathodic peaks than the SS-LVP/C composite. Furthermore, as concluded in Table 1 , the potential differences between anodic peaks and cathodic peaks are smaller in the PS-LVP/C electrode. It indicates the enhanced electrode reaction reversibility of PS-LVP/C electrode due to the porous structure. Therefore, the PS-LVP/C composite has higher discharge capacity and better cyclic ability. EIS measurements are carried out in the frequency range of 100 kHz to10 mHz at the discharge state (3.0 V) after 3 cycles, and the Nyquist plots of the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C electrodes are shown in Fig. 7 a . Fig. 7 b presents an equivalent circuit to simulate the electrochemical impedance data. R el represents the solution resistance; R ct and C dl stand for the related charge-transfer resistance and double-layer capacitance, respectively; W represents the diffusion-controlled Warburg impedance in the low frequency [11,43] . C int stands for the Li + intercalation capacitance [11,44–46] . It is found that the R ct value of PS-LVP/C electrode (117.1 Ω) is much smaller than that of SS-LVP/C (510.5 Ω), indicating that the electrons and Li ions can transfer more quickly due to the porous structure. Thus, the PS-LVP/C composite exhibits the enhanced electrode reaction kinetics and improved electrochemical performance. 4 Conclusions Spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C composites were successfully prepared by using hydrazine hydrate as the spheroidizing medium. Electrochemical tests show that the spherical Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C with pores exhibited excellent electrochemical performance. At a charge–discharge rate of 15 C, this composite could deliver a discharge capacity of 100.5 and 121.5 mAh g −1 in the potential regions of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V, respectively. The excellent electrochemical performance should be attributed to the porous structure, which can make the lithium ion diffusion and electron transfer more easily across the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /electrolyte interfaces, thus resulting in the enhanced electrode reaction kinetics and improved electrochemical performance. References [1] S.-C. Yin H. Grondey P. Strobel H. Huang L.F. Nazar J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 2003 326 [2] H. Huang T. Faulkner J. Barker M.Y. Saidi J. Power Sources 189 2009 748 [3] M.Y. Saïdi J. Barker H. Huang J.L. Swoyer G. Adamson J. Power Sources 119–121 2003 266 [4] X.H. Rui N. Ding J. Liu C. Li C.H. Chen Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 2384 [5] H. Huang S.-C. Yin T. Kerr N. Taylor L.F. Nazar Adv. Mater. 14 2002 1525 [6] Y.Z. Li Z. Zhou X.P. Gao J. Yan Electrochim. Acta 52 2007 4922 [7] T. Jiang W.C. Pan J. Wang X.F. Bie F. Du Y.J. Wei C.Z. Wang G. Chen Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 3864 [8] Y.Q. Qiao X.L. Wang Y. Zhou J.Y. Xiang D. Zhang S.J. Shi J.P. Tu Electrochim. Acta 56 2010 510 [9] S.-C. Yin P.S. Strobel H. Grondey L.F. Nazar Chem. Mater. 16 2004 1456 [10] S.Q. Liu S.C. Li K.L. Huang Z.H. Chen Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 23 2007 537 [11] J.S. Huang L. Yang K.Y. Liu Y.F. Tang J. Power Sources 195 2010 5013 [12] C.S. Dai Z.Y. Chen H.Z. Jin X.G. Hu J. Power Sources 195 2010 5775 [13] Q. Kuang Y.M. Zhao X.N. An J.M. Liu Y.Z. Dong L. Chen Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 1575 [14] Y.H. Chen Y.M. Zhao X.N. An J.M. Liu Y.Z. Dong L. Chen Electrochim. Acta 54 2009 5844 [15] A.Q. Pan J. Liu J.-G. Zhang W. Xu G.Z. Cao Z.M. Nie B.W. Arey S.Q. Liang Electrochem. Commun. 12 2010 1674 [16] M.M. Ren Z. Zhou X.P. Gao W.X. Peng J.P. Wei J. Phys. Chem. C 112 2008 5689 [17] Y.Q. Qiao X.L. Wang J.Y. Xiang D. Zhang W.L. Liu J.P. Tu Electrochim. Acta 56 2011 2269 [18] J.W. Wang J. Liu G.L. Yang X.F. Zhang X.D. Yan X.M. Pan R.S. Wang Electrochim. Acta 54 2009 6451 [19] X.H. Rui C. Li J. Liu T. Cheng C.H. Chen Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 6761 [20] J.W. Wang X.F. Zhang J. Liu G.L. Yang Y.C. Ge Z.J. Yu R.S. Wang X.M. Pan Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 6879 [21] G. Yang H.M. Ji H.D. Liu B. Qian X.F. Jiang Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 3669 [22] L. Zhang X.L. Wang J.Y. Xiang Y. Zhou S.J. Shi J.P. Tu J. Power Sources 195 2010 5057 [23] L.J. Wang X.C. Zhou Y.L. Guo J. Power Sources 195 2010 2844 [24] L. Wang X.Q. Jiang X. Li X.Q. Pi Y. Ren F. Wu Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 5057 [25] X.H. Rui Y. Jin X.Y. Feng L.C. Zhang C.H. Chen J. Power Sources 196 2011 2109 [26] X.H. Rui N. Yesibolati C.H. Chen J. Power Sources 196 2011 2279 [27] Y.N. Ko, H.Y. Koo, J.H. Kim, J.H. Yi, Y.C. Kang, J.-H. Lee, J. Power Sources (2011),doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.086. [28] Y.-G. Guo J.-S. Hu L.-J. Wan Adv. Mater. 20 2008 2878 [29] F. Yu J.J. Zhang Y.F. Yang G.Z. Song J. Power Sources 195 2010 6873 [30] F. Yu J.J. Zhang Y.F. Yang G.Z. Song J. Mater. Chem. 19 2009 9121 [31] J.Z. Chen L. Yang Y.F. Tang J. Power Sources 195 2010 6893 [32] X.H. Huang J.P. Tu B. Zhang C.Q. Zhang Y. Li Y.F. Yuan H.M. Wu J. Power Sources 161 2006 541 [33] S.Q. Wang J.Y. Zhang C.H. Chen J. Power Sources 195 2010 5379 [34] X.Y. Han Q.F. Meng T.L. Sun J.T. Sun J. Power Sources 195 2010 3047 [35] X.H. Huang J.P. Tu C.Q. Zhang X.T. Chen Y.F. Yuan H.M. Wu Electrochim. Acta 52 2007 4177 [36] H.-M. Xie R.-S. Wang J.-R. Ying L.-Y. Zhang A.F. Jalbout H.-Y. Yu G.-L. Yang X.-M. Pan Z.-M. Su Adv. Mater. 18 2006 2609 [37] H.M. Wu J.P. Tu Y.Z. Yang D.Q. Shi J. Mater. Sci. 41 2006 4247 [38] F. Yu J.J. Zhang Y.F. Yang G.Z. Song J. Power Sources 189 2009 794 [39] B. Huang X.D. Zheng D.M. Jia M. Lu Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 1227 [40] X.Y. Wang S.Y. Yin K.L. Zhang Y.X. Zhang J. Alloys Compd. 486 2009 L5 [41] C.M. Burba R. Frech Solid State Ionics 177 2007 3445 [42] J.Y. Xiang X.L. Wang X.H. Xia L. Zhang Y. Zhou S.J. Shi J.P. Tu Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 4921 [43] J.Y. Xiang J.P. Tu L. Zhang X.L. Wang Y. Zhou Y.Q. Qiao Y. Lu J. Power Sources 195 2010 8331 [44] K. Dokko M. Mohamedi M. Umeda I. Uchida J. Electrochem. Soc. 150 2003 A425 [45] J. Xie N. Imanishi T. Zhang A. Hirano Y. Takeda O. Yamamoto J. Power Sources 189 2009 365 [46] Y.H. Rho K. Dokko K. Kanamura J. Power Sources 157 2006 471