Benchmark Study of Density Functional Theory Methods in Geometry Optimization of Transition Metal-Dinitrogen Complexes
Chaoyue Zhao,Rongkai Wu,Shuoqing Zhang,Xin Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c04215
2023-01-01
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Abstract:The current benchmark study is focused on determiningthe mostprecise theoretical method for optimizing the geometry of transitionmetal-dinitrogen complexes. To accomplish this goal, sevendensity functional (DF) methods from five distinct classes of densityfunctional theory (DFT) have been selected, including B3LYP-D3(BJ),BP86-D3(BJ), PBE0-D3(BJ), & omega;B97X-D, M06, M06-L, and TPSSh-D3(BJ).These DFs will be utilized with the Karlsruhe basis set (def2-SVP).To carry out this benchmark study, a total of forty-two structurallydiverse transition metal-dinitrogen compounds with experimentallyknown X-ray data have been selected from the Cambridge CrystallographicData Centre (CCDC). Based on a comparison of the theoretical datawith experimental values (X-ray) of the selected transition metal-dinitrogencompounds, statistical parameters such as root-mean-square deviation(RMSD) and N-N and M-N bond lengths are obtained toevaluate the performance of the seven chosen DFs. According to theobtained results, among all DFT methods used in the study, Minnesotafunctionals (M06 and M06-L) and TPSSh-D3(BJ) show good performance,with lower RMSD values. This suggests that these three methods arethe most reliable for optimizing the geometry of transition metal-dinitrogencomplexes. Based on the absolute errors of the N-N and M-Nbond lengths relative to the X-ray data, further analysis is conducted,and it is determined that M06-L is the best functional for optimizingthe geometry of transition metal-dinitrogen compounds. Additionally,the influence of using a high-level basis set (def2-TZVP) comparedto def2-SVP on the calculated RMSD among the seven chosen methodsis found to be negligible.