Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

Ancient China's Case Law Research

On Jurisprudence Leading to Judicial Path——the Realism Path of China's Jurisprudence

"Typical Cases" As an Informal Legal Source in the Administrative Law

Analysis on the Spirit of Ancient Chinese Judicial Rules

The Research of China Ancient Times Judicial System Characteristic and Modern Model

Ancient Chinese Concepts of Understanding Law

Reformation, Inheritance and the Evolvement of Law: A Cultural Analysis of Confucianization of the Ancient Chinese Laws

A Study of the Research Mode on the Traditional Legal Ideology of the Ancient China --citing an Example of "rite and Punishment" from the Confucianism Theory Before the Qin Dynasty

Development of the Court Verdicts of Ancient China and Its Cultural Implications

The History of Chinese Legal Civilization

Common Sense and Local Judicatory in Traditional China:Thinking from a Complicated Case

Ancient China’s Legal Tradition and Legal Thought

Major Tasks and Focuses on Civil Litigation Jurisprudence during the Transformation Period of China

The Formation of Precedent and the Case-guiding System in China

Probe on the New Perspectives and Approaches on Precedents Study

Chinese criminal jurisprudence (1979–2009)

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

Reflections on the Chinese Jurisprudence——The Nature of Jurisprudence and Different Approaches of Recently Chinese Jurisprudence

Forty Themes on the Innovation and Development of Chinese Legal Research in the Reform and Opening Up Era

On the Characteristics of Chinese Legal Culture by Studying the Ancient Liege Relationship

Study on Criminal Jurisprudence: Western Countries' Experience and China's Reality