Challenge and Response: The Course of "Foreign Literature History" Reconsidered

Wang Xiangyuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6101.2005.02.013

2005-01-01

Abstract:Recently, the field of comparative literature in China struck an inharmonious pitch. From the viewpoint of original-text-fundamentalism, some argued that world literature could not hold water and thus the history of foreign literature or world literature in the department of Chinese should be canceled. Apparently, this argument is unfounded in theory and harmful in practice. However, to some extent, it also shows the reform of the course of foreign literary history should be sped up and deepened. Instead of transplanting national literary history in the department of foreign languages, an effective resolution to this challenge is to substitute this course with the history of Chinese translation literature. It should be made clear that teaching foreign literature in Chinese in the department of Chinese is essentially different from that in any given foreign language, whether in terms of aim or effect. One of the major ways of Chinese literature in assimilating the gist of foreign literature is to teach foreign literature in the department of Chinese. To teach foreign literature in Chinese is by itself an act of confrontation and fusion of different literatures and cultures, which is, as a consequence, a kind of comparative literature. Similarly, in the process of teaching in Chinese, foreign literature has been sifted, transformed and reinterpreted within the context of Chinese language and Chinese culture and thus in essence a kind of translation literature.