Abstract:Cephalometric analysis is a standard diagnostic tool in orthodontics and craniofacial surgery. Today, as conventional 2D cephalometry is limited and susceptible to analysis bias, a more reliable and user-friendly three-dimensional system that includes hard tissue, soft tissue, and airways is demanded in clinical practice. We launched our study to develop such a system based on CT data and landmarks. This study aims to determine whether the data labeled through our process is highly qualified and whether the soft tissue and airway data derived from CT scans are reliable. We enrolled 15 patients (seven males, eight females, 26.47 ± 3.44 years old) diagnosed with either non-syndromic dento–maxillofacial deformities or OSDB in this study to evaluate the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of our system. A total of 126 landmarks were adopted and divided into five sets by region: 28 cranial points, 25 mandibular points, 20 teeth points, 48 soft tissue points, and 6 airway points. All the landmarks were labeled by two experienced clinical practitioners, either of whom had labeled all the data twice at least one month apart. Furthermore, 78 parameters of three sets were calculated in this study: 42 skeletal parameters (23 angular and 19 linear), 27 soft tissue parameters (9 angular and 18 linear), and 9 upper airway parameters (2 linear, 4 areal, and 3 voluminal). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of landmark coordinate values and measurement parameters. The overwhelming majority of the landmarks showed excellent intra- and inter-examiner reliability. For skeletal parameters, angular parameters indicated better reliability, while linear parameters performed better for soft tissue parameters. The intra- and inter-examiner ICCs of airway parameters referred to excellent reliability. In summary, the data labeled through our process are qualified, and the soft tissue and airway data derived from CT scans are reliable. Landmarks that are not commonly used in clinical practice may require additional attention while labeling as they are prone to poor reliability. Measurement parameters with values close to 0 tend to have low reliability. We believe this three-dimensional cephalometric system would reach clinical application.

The accuracy analysis of semiautomatic identification of landmarks using computer aided cervical vertebra analysis

Accuracy and Repeatability of Computer Aided Cervical Vertebra Landmarking in Cephalogram

Establishment of an Intelligent Cervical Vertebrae Maturity Assessment System Based on Cone Beam CT Data.

Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: Accuracy and reliability.

Precision of Cephalometric Landmark Identification from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Reproducibility of Landmarks on Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery

Accuracy and repeatability analysis of Quantitative Cervical Vertebral Maturation (QCVM) for adolescents with normal occlusion

Accuracy and Reliability of Craniofacial Landmark Identification Based on Three-Dimensional Images

PRELIMARY STUDY OF COMPUTERIZED AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF LANDMARKS IN X-RAY CEPHALOMETRY

The Reliability of Three-Dimensional Landmark-Based Craniomaxillofacial and Airway Cephalometric Analysis.

Appraise to the Clinical Practice Situation of the Computerized Automatic Cephalometric Analysis System

Automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks

Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted landmark identification in serial lateral cephalograms of Class III patients who underwent orthodontic treatment and two-jaw orthognathic surgery

Assessing AudaxCeph®'s cephalometric tracing technology versus a semi-automated approach for analyzing severe Class II and Class III skeletons

Accuracy and reliability of craniofacial manual landmark identification on cone beam CT images of dry skulls

A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis

Automatic Landmark Annotation and Measurement of 3D Mandibular Morphology Using Non-Rigid Registration: A Preliminary Exploration and Accuracy Assessment

Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence

Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Accuracy of auto-identification of the posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using cascade convolution neural network algorithm and cephalometric images of different quality from nationwide multiple centers

Accuracy of posteroanterior cephalogram landmarks and measurements identification using a cascaded convolutional neural network algorithm: A multicenter study