Wordsworth and Collins

Sandro Jung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/anqq.22.1.19-24
2009-01-01
ANQ
Abstract:William Collins (1721–59), a friend of James Thomson, appealed to Romantic poets for three distinct reasons. First, like Christopher Smart and Thomas Chatterton, he was beguilingly contextualized in a myth of madness that read him as a victim of his own sensibility and genius. In the Lives of the Most Eminent English Poets (1781), Samuel Johnson discussed Collins’s supposed madness, and Byron included him in a list of unfortunate authors, mentioning the “frenzy of Collins” (6: 85). Second, as the author of Odes on Several Descriptive and Allegoric Subjects (1746) and Ode on the Death of Mr. Thomson (1749), Collins (especially as the author of the “Ode on the Poetical Character”) was read (especially by Samuel Taylor Coleridge) as a poet of the sublime, whereas Wordsworth comprehended his poetry in terms of evocative landscape description, an elegiac impulse, and a notion of imaginative memory that Wordsworth deploys in his early poetry. Finally, although Robert Southey censured Collins for his imagery and diction, he commended his use of the blank verse lyric, noting: “Of blank lyrics my predilection strengthens. Milton[,] Collins[,] Glover and Sayers are good names to establish a precedent” (1: 45). Collins’s “Ode to Evening” is one of these “blank lyrics” and enjoyed considerable popularity with the Romantic poets (Jung). This article further explores Collins’s importance for the Romantics. It offers a brief discussion of Wordsworth’s interest in Collins, focusing on his general appreciation of the poet’s works, his reading of Collins’s elegiac impulse, and his intention to publish an edition of Collins’s poetry. It concludes by introducing Coleridge’s contrasting interpretation of Collins as a sublime poet. That Wordsworth was steeped in the poetry of the eighteenth century is well known; he was particularly interested in Collins, to whom he repeatedly referred as a poet, along with Thomson and John Dyer, who “had more poetic Imagination than any of [his . . .] Contemporaries” (qtd. in Hill 5: 3) and whose odes he discussed with Klopstock, who observed that “he had read them with pleasure” (Klopstock qtd. in Wordsworth, Prose Works 1: 94). Wordsworth mentioned Collins in the “Essay, Supplementary to the Preface” of Lyrical Ballads:
What problem does this paper attempt to address?