Synthesising Difference: Charlotte Brooke'S Reliques Of Irish Poetry, The Construction Of Identity And The Politics Of The Literary Collection
Sandro Jung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393270902859903
2009-01-01
Studia Neophilologica
Abstract:Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1 See Sandro Jung, David Mallet, Anglo-Scot: Poetry, Politics and Patronage in the Age of Union (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2008) and Leith Davis, “Birth of the Nation: Gender and Writing in the Works of Henry and Charlotte Brooke”, Eighteenth-Century Life, 18:1 (1994), pp. 27–47. 2 Charlotte Brooke, Reliques of Irish Poetry (Dublin: George Bonham, 1789). 3 R. N. Ashley, “‘From Dark Oblivion Snatch'd, and Failing Language’: Charlotte Brooke as Translator”, Etudes Irlandaises, 5 (1980), p. 66. 4 See Francis William James Ferguson, “Spiritual godfather, spiritual godchild: Thomas Percy and Charlotte Brooke: late eighteenth century negotiations with literary culture through poetry, publishing and patronage” (University of Belfast MA thesis, 1998). See also, Bertram Hylton Davis, Thomas Percy: A Scholar-Cleric in the Age of Johnson (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989) and Nick Groom, The Making of Percy's Reliques (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999). 5 See Barbara M. Benedict, Making the Modern Reader: Cultural Mediation in Early Modern Literary Anthologies (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996). 6 See Micheál MacCraith, “Charlotte Brooke and James MacPherson”, Litteraria Pragensia, 10:2 (2000), pp. 5–17 as well as Kenneth F. Gantz “Charlotte Brooke's Reliques of Irish Poetry and the Ossianic Controversy”, Studies in English, 21 (1941), pp. 137–56. 7 Barbara M. Benedict, “Publishing and Reading Poetry”, The Cambridge Companion to Eighteenth-Century Poetry, ed. John Sitter (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 68. 8 These traditional views are put forward in Leonard R. N. Ashley, “‘From Dark Oblivion Snatch'd, and Failing Language’: Charlotte Brooke as Translator”, Etudes Irlandaises, 5 (1980), pp. 65–74 and Cathal G. O Háinle, “Towards the Revival: Some Translations of Irish Poetry, 1789–1897”, Literature and the Changing Ireland, ed. Peter Connolly (Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble, 1982), pp. 37–57. 9 Charlotte Brooke, Reliques of Irish Poetry, ed. Leonard R. N. Ashley (Gainesville, Florida: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints, 1970), p. vii. All references are to this edition and are given parenthetically in the text. 10 The Reliques were reviewed in The Critical Review, 70 (July–December 1790), pp. 22–34, and The Monthly Review, 4 (second series) (January–April 1791), pp. 37–48. The reviewer of Reliques in The Monthly Review was “sometimes smiling at the excess to which she has carried her enthusiasm”. Cited in Ashley, “‘From Dark Oblivion Snatch'd’”, p. 71. 11 See Sandro Jung, “The Discourse(s) of Identity: Englishness, Irishness and Jewishness in Maria Edgeworth's Castle Rackrent (1800)”, Etudes Irlandaises, 27:1 (2002), pp. 27–36. 12 Ashley, “‘From Dark Oblivion Snatch'd’”, notes that Brooke “regarded herself less as a scholar than as an anthologist, in the strict sense of the word, as a gatherer of other men's flowers” (p. 68). 13 Davis, “Birth of the Nation”, p. 38, notes: “While appearing to pay a compliment to Percy by imitating his project, Brooke actually sets herself up in direct opposition to his ideas”, for the “Gaelic originals speak loudly, contradicting the anglicizations. Merely by being present […] they point out the inevitable compromise of translation and of the violence of the translating letter. Further than this, Brooke directs our attention to the originals’ refusal to be translated” (p. 43). 14 See Julia M. Wright, “‘Sons of Song’: Irish Literature in the Age of Nationalism”, Romantic Poetry, ed. Angela Esterhammer (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2002), pp. 333–53. 15 The periphrastic style so characteristic of Augustan poetic diction is noted in Walker's Memoirs. He therefore relegated one of Brooke's translations of a poem by Carolan to a note rather than to the main text. 16 Charlotte Brooke, “Proposal for printing by subscription Reliques of Ancient Poetry” (Dublin: William Slater, 1788). 17 Clare O'Halloran, “Irish Re-Creations of the Gaelic Past: The Challenge of Macpherson's Ossian”, Past and Present, 124 (1989), p. 86. 18 Dominick Trant, the “gentleman too well known to need my panegyric” (ix), published Considerations on the Present Disturbances in the Province of Munster in Dublin in 1787. 19 O'Halloran, “Irish Re-Creations of the Gaelic Past: The Challenge of Macpherson's Ossian”, p. 87. 20 See Betty Schellenberg, The Professionalization of Women Writers in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005). 21 See Heather Larmour, “Anthologising the author in the eighteenth-century beauties tradition” (University of Liverpool PhD, 2002). 22 R. A. Breathnach, “Two Eighteenth-Century Irish Scholars: J. C. Walker and Charlotte Brooke”, Studia Hibernica, 5 (1965), p. 88. 23 Ibid., p. 90. 24 Ibid., p. 93. 25 Ibid., p. 93. 26 O'Halloran, “Irish Re-Creations of the Gaelic Past”, p. 89. 27 Ibid., p. 87. 28 MacCraith, “Charlotte Brooke and James MacPherson”, p. 6. 29 Ibid., p. 11.