Abstract:Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver cancer has shown promising therapeutic effects. Effective treatment relies not only on the precise delivery provided by image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) but also high dose gradient formed around the treatment volume to spare functional liver tissue, which is highly dependent on the beam/arc angle selection. In this study, we aim to develop a decision support model to learn human planner's beam navigation approach for beam angle/arc angle selection for liver SBRT. Methods: A total of 27 liver SBRT/HIGRT patients (10 IMRT, 17 VMAT/DCA) were included in this study. A dosimetric budget index was defined for each beam angle/control point considering dose penetration through the patient body and liver tissue. Optimal beam angle setting (beam angles for IMRT and start/terminal angle for VMAT/DCA) was determined by minimizing the loss function defined as the sum of total dosimetric budget index and beam span penalty function. Leave-one-out validation was exercised on all 27 cases while weighting coefficients in the loss function was tuned in nested cross validation. To compare the efficacy of the model, a model plan was generated using automatically generated beam setting while retaining the original optimization constraints in the clinical plan. Model plan was normalized to the same planning target volume (PTV) V100% as the clinical plans. Dosimetric endpoints including PTV D98%, D2%, liver V20Gy and total MU were compared between two plan groups. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was performed with the null hypothesis being that no difference exists between two plan groups. Results: Beam setting prediction was instantaneous. Mean PTV D98% was 91.3% and 91.3% (P=0.566), while mean PTV D2% was 107.9% and 108.1% (P=0.164) for clinical plan and model plan respectively. Liver V20Gy showed no significant difference (P=0.590) with 23.3% for clinical plan and 23.4% for the model plan. Total MU is comparable (P=0.256) between the clinical plan (avg. 2,389.6) and model plan (avg. 2,319.6). Conclusions: The evidence driven beam setting model yielded similar plan quality as hand-crafted clinical plan. It is capable of capturing human's knowledge in beam selection decision making. This model could facilitate decision making for beam angle selection while eliminating lengthy trial-and-error process of adjusting beam setting during liver SBRT treatment planning.

Binary Level-Set Shape Optimization Model and Algorithm for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Radiotherapy Treatment.

Binary Level-Set Shape Optimization Model and Algorithm for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Cancer Radiotherapy

Treatment Planning for Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Model and Heuristic Algorithms

Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Using Multicriteria Optimization for Body and Extremity Sarcoma.

Randomized algorithms for high quality treatment planning in volumetric modulated arc therapy

A linearized model and nested-partitions heuristics for VMAT radiation treatment planning optimization

Ultra-fast treatment plan optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

Optimization of Treatment Geometry to Reduce Normal Brain Dose in Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases with Single–Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

A two-stage approach for VMAT treatment plan optimization

The Development Of A Novel Radiation Treatment Modality-Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Knowledge-based Semi-Automated Optimization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Plans Using a Volume Modulated Arc Therapy-Configured Model

Direct leaf trajectory optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning with sliding window delivery

Bi-Level Optimization to Enhance Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning

A Multi-Criteria Framework with Voxel-Dependent Parameters for Radiotherapy Treatment Plan Optimization

Beam Orientation Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Using Mixed Integer Programming

A Proof of Principle: Multi-Modality Radiotherapy Optimization

Guaranteed epsilon-optimal treatment plans with minimum number of beams for stereotactic body radiation therapy

Applying mixed-integer linear programming to the non-coplanar beam angle optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for liver cancer

A data-driven approach to optimal beam/arc angle selection for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning

Solving Beam-Angle Selection and Dose Optimization Simultaneously Via High-Throughput Computing