Abstract:To quantitatively compare the aperture-based and beamlet-based inverse planning techniques and draw conclusion with regard to the dependence of plan quality on the number of segments of the incident fields using three clinical cases of different disease sites. We developed a combined aperture based inverse planning algorithm. After the number of segments was specified, the beam eyes views (BEVs) are applied to delineate the maximum MLC field boundary for each gantry angle. The BEV apertures were chosen to be the initial settings of aperture shapes and served as physical constraints of aperture settings. In the proposed algorithm, we utilized the fast adaptive simulated annealing (ASA) technique to select the field shapes defined by the MLC leaf coordinates. A descent gradient-based optimization technique was employed to search for the optimal aperture weights under the guidance of a conventional quadratic objective function. By combing the fast ASA with the descent gradient search algorithm, the computational efficiency was consistently improved. The beamlet-based inverse planning used the same objective function and the descent gradient-based optimization. Beamlet-based optimization with 1cm × 1cm size was used to obtain the optimized fluence maps (10 intensity levels). Three clinical cases (prostate, thoracic, and head and neck) were selected for the comparative study. For each case, the gantry angles are chosen manually and beamlet-based inverse planning was performed. Aperture based optimization was done with the same beam configuration and beam modality. A range of number of segments (5 to 25) was investigated. Plans with different number of segments were evaluated based on the DVH and dose distribution improvements and the treatment times involved. The combined aperture-based inverse planning algorithm was implemented and tested by comparing with conventional simulated annealing algorithm for aperture-based IMRT. The same quality plans were achieved but the computation time was reduced even by an order of magnitude. The improvement in performance directly was directly resulted from the fact that the objective function is well behaved analytical function with respect to beam weights. The key results found from the comparative study are that the dose distribution and DVHs were improved with the increase of the number of segments. When the number is increased up to ∼14, the dose distribution obtained from aperture based optimization is quite similar to that of the beamlet-based optimization provided the leaves can be adjusted in 0.2cm increments in the aperture-based inverse planning. Further increase of the segment number only lead to minor improvement in dose distributions with much increased computing time. Considering the tradeoff between the plan quality and planning time, it seems that the optimal number of segment is between 10 ∼ 20. Aperture-based inverse planning seems to be a viable option for IMRT and eliminating the step of leaf sequencing. For a few different disease sites, our study indicate that the technique can produce IMRT plans comparable with that of beamlet-based inverse planning when the number of segments per fields is above ∼10. The improvement saturates gradually as the number of segments increased to above ∼20.

Beam Orientation Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Using Mixed Integer Programming

A Feedback Constraint Optimization Method for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Selection of Beam Orientations in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Using Single-Beam Indices and Integer Programming

Applying mixed-integer linear programming to the non-coplanar beam angle optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for liver cancer

Quantitative Comparison of Aperture-Based and Beamlet-Based Inverse Planning Techniques

Two Effective Heuristics for Beam Angle Optimization in Radiation Therapy

A New Monte Carlo-based Treatment Plan Optimization Approach for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

A Two-Stage Sequential Linear Programming Approach to Imrt Dose Optimization

Fraction-variant Beam Orientation Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy.

A novel fast robust optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated proton therapy with minimum monitor unit constraint

A Nested Partitions Framework for Beam Angle Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

MO-D-351-05: A “slicing” Approach for IMRT Optimization Using Linear Programming

MO-D-351-03: A Unified Approach to Beam Angle Selection and Dose Optimization with High-Throughput Computing for IMRT

Fast non-coplanar beam orientation optimization based on group sparsity

Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for non-coplanar IMRT

Solving Beam-Angle Selection and Dose Optimization Simultaneously Via High-Throughput Computing

Lung IMRT planning with automatic determination of beam angle configurations.

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Beam Angle Optimization of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

A Fast Robust Optimizer for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Using GPU.

Optimizing spot intensity with lower bound constraints for IMPT: Exposing shortcomings and introducing an enhanced strategy

Guaranteed epsilon-optimal treatment plans with minimum number of beams for stereotactic body radiation therapy